Featured Product

    BoE Statement on SRB and Pillar 2A in Stress Test Hurdle Rates

    July 12, 2018

    BoE published a statement providing details on two changes to the way hurdle rates are calculated in the annual stress test. These changes are only relevant to firms under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). In its document on the key elements of the 2018 stress test, which was published in March 2018, BoE had noted its intention to change the way hurdle rates are calculated in the annual stress test in four ways.

    The two changes on which the statement provides details are as follows:

    • Hurdle rates will incorporate buffers to capture domestic systemic importance as well as global systemic importance.
    • The calculation of minimum capital requirements incorporated in the hurdle rates will more accurately reflect how they would evolve in a real stress.

    The Systemic Risk Buffer (SRB) increases the capacity of certain UK systemic banks to absorb stress, reflecting their significance for the domestic economy. Beginning in 2019, SRB rates will be set for ring-fenced banks (RFB) and large building societies by PRA. For the purpose of the 2018 stress test, in calculating these uplifts to firms’ hurdle rates, PRA will assume the following SRB rates for the SRB institutions: 1% for Barclays, 1% for HSBC, 2.5% for Lloyds Banking Group, 1% for Nationwide, 1.5% for RBS, and 1% for Santander UK. These are assumed rates for the concurrent stress-test purposes only. Actual SRB rates for affected firms will be determined and published for the first time in 2019.

    The annual stress test uses a risk-weighted hurdle rate, including Pillar 2A, which is a minimum capital requirement applied to cover a range of risks not (or not adequately) captured in Pillar 1. In the previous stress tests, the Pillar 2A element of the hurdle rate had been set as a constant share of risk-weighted assets over the five-year stress horizon. To ensure that the Pillar 2A requirements in the 2018 stress test more closely reflect the probable impact of stress on the risks captured in Pillar 2A, the Prudential Regulation Committee (PRC) has developed an approach in which each Pillar 2A risk component scales with a simple metric. This approach will preserve the current simplicity in the calculation of hurdle rates. These scaling bases are not intended to be forward guidance on how PRA will set Pillar 2A requirements in such a scenario; rather, they provide a simple way to ensure Pillar 2A requirements in the stress test more closely reflect the probable impact of the stress on the risks captured in Pillar 2A.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Systemic Risk Buffer, Pillar 2A, Stress Testing, Stress Test 2018, Hurdle Rates, BoE

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Revises Related Entities Standard for Banks

    APRA published a strengthened prudential standard APS 222 on associations with related entities, with the aim to mitigate contagion risk within banking groups.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB on Responses to Consultation on Wind-Down of Trading Portfolios

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on the solvent wind-down of the derivatives and trading book portfolio of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Responses to Consultation on Resolvability Disclosures

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on disclosures for resolution planning and resolvability of banks.

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Revises Implementation Schedule for Initial Margin Rules

    HKMA intends to adopt a revised implementation schedule for the margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Revises Guideline on Application of Banking Disclosure Rules

    HKMA issued a revised version of the Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-D-1 on guideline on the application of the Banking (Disclosure) Rules (BDR).

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Decision on Recognizing Reporting Member States Under AnaCredit

    ECB has finalized the Decision 2019/1348 (ECB/2019/20) that establishes procedure for recognizing non-euro area member states as reporting member states under the AnaCredit Regulation (EU 2016/867).

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes to Extend CECL Standard Deadline for Certain Entities

    FASB proposed an Accounting Standards Update that would grant private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and certain small public companies additional time to implement FASB standards on current expected credit losses (CECL), leases, and hedging.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IASB Adds Phase Two of IBOR Reform to Its Work Plan

    IASB (or the Board) has added the second phase of its project focused on potential financial reporting implications linked to the interest rate benchmark reform—interbank offer rate (IBOR) reform—to its work plan.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Updates Draft Instructions for Proposed FR Y-14 Reporting Forms

    FED updated draft instructions for the monthly, quarterly, and annual capital assessments and stress testing reports, also known as forms FR Y-14M, FR Y-14Q, FR Y-14A, respectively.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Taxonomy Changes Related to Topics 326, 815, and 842

    FASB is proposing taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Update on clarifying the interactions among topic 321 on investments in equity securities), topic 323 on investments under equity method and joint ventures), and topic 815 on derivatives and hedging.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3665