BoE, FCA, and PRA jointly published a discussion paper on strengthening the operational resilience of financial services (FS) firms. The discussion paper is intended to share the thinking of supervisory authorities regarding operational resilience and obtain feedback. Responses should be submitted by October 05, 2018.
The paper explains why the supervisory authorities consider that managing operational resilience is most effectively addressed by focusing on business services, rather than on systems and processes. It also explains that financial stability rests on the operational resilience of individual firms, financial market infrastructure (FMI), and the system as a whole. The paper then suggests that the boards and senior management of firms and FMIs would set their own tolerances for operational disruption, on the assumption that that some or all supporting systems and processes will fail. Next, it expands the idea that firms and FMIs would develop impact tolerances for important business services; it explains how supervisors could gain assurance that firms and FMIs ensure the continuity of their most important business services and that boards and senior management are sufficiently engaged. Finally, the paper summarizes some of the key concepts set out in the discussion paper and provides a complete list of the discussion questions.
Operational disruptions to the products and services that firms and FMIs provide have the potential to cause harm to consumers and market participants, threaten the viability of firms and FMIs, and cause instability in the financial system. The discussion paper focuses on how the provision of these products and services can be maintained. Operational resilience refers to the ability of firms, FMIs, and the sector as a whole to prevent, respond to, recover, and learn from operational disruptions.
Comment Due Date: October 05, 2018
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, PMI, FMI, Operational Resilience, Business Continuity, FCA, PRA, BoE
Previous ArticleESMA Publishes Technical Advice Under the Prospectus Regulation
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.