EBA published a report presenting the outcome of its assessment to the EC’s call for advice on the European Secured Notes (ESNs). In addition, it puts forward recommendations on key aspects for EC to consider when possibly designing the legislative framework for small and medium-size enterprises (SME) European Secured Notes.
SME European Secured Notes, similar to covered bonds, could be structured as a dual recourse instrument. Due to the high-risk profile of SME exposures, EBA suggests a more restrictive framework, especially with respect to the coverage, the liquidity, and the disclosure requirements and suggests strict eligibility criteria at both loan and pool level and a minimum level of over-collateralization of at least 30%. In terms of capital requirement, it is advised that no preferential treatment (that is, similar to covered bonds) is granted. However, a differentiated risk-weight treatment compared to unsecured notes could be considered subject to certain considerations.
EBA does not recommend the creation of an infrastructure European Secured Notes. A dual recourse structure for Infrastructure loans is not appropriate given the lack of granularity in a cover pool, the complexity of the loan structures and the specific and different nature of infrastructure projects making it very difficult to create a high quality dynamic cover pool of infrastructure loans. EBA recommends EC to investigate the case for a new distinct asset class for high-quality project finance loans in the form of a standardized EU infrastructure bond. Further EBA work would be needed to specify the features and the applicable framework for this potential new product. This contribution will provide input into the EC's considerations on the further development of the Capital Markets Union project.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, European Secured Notes, Covered Bonds, EBA
Previous ArticleBoE/FCA/PRA Consult on Building Operational Resilience of FS Firms
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
MAS revised the guidelines that address technology and cyber risks of financial institutions, in an environment of growing use of cloud technologies, application programming interfaces, and rapid software development.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.