EIOPA Report Examines Use of Solvency II Capital Add-Ons in 2019
EIOPA published a report on the use of Solvency II capital add-ons during 2019. The capital add-on measure is intended to ensure that the regulatory capital requirements reflect the risk profile of the undertaking or of the group. Therefore, it is important that it is used by national competent authorities when needed. This analysis in this report draws on a survey on the use of capital add-ons and on the 2019 year-end Solvency II data submitted by reporting entities from the 30 European Economic Area countries and from UK. The results show that, in 2019, nine national competent authorities had set capital add-ons for 19 solo undertakings, out of the 2,816 insurance and reinsurance undertakings under the scope of Solvency II.
The 19 solo undertakings include nine non-life undertakings, five life undertakings, one composite undertaking, and four reinsurance undertakings. The number of capital add-on was broadly in line with the 2018 figures, when eight national competent authorities had set capital add-ons for a total of 21 solo undertakings including 10 non-life undertakings, eight life undertakings, two composites, and one reinsurer. The amount of capital add-ons imposed on undertakings using the standard formula remains very low overall in 2019, accounting for less than 0.5% of the total Solvency Capital Requirement or SCR. However, the amount of capital add-on is not insignificant when considering the amount at individual level. In sum, as of the year-end 2019, the weight of the capital add-on over the total Solvency Capital Requirement for undertakings using the standard formula with capital add-ons increased to 38% (from 32% in 2018). This applies to both solo undertakings and groups. All national competent authorities reported no changes to the internal process of setting and reviewing capital add-ons and the vast majority of authorities have no formal policies in place. Of the national competent authorities that set capital add-ons, only two have formal policies in place. Most national competent authorities find the current legislation and regulation, including the content of the implementing regulation, sufficient and adequate for the purpose of setting capital add-ons.
The Solvency II Directive states each capital add-on shall be reviewed at least once a year by the supervisory authority and be removed when the undertakings have remedied the deficiencies, which led to its imposition. This requires proactive monitoring of the situation that led to the imposition of the capital add-on by both national competent authorities and the relevant undertaking or group. The undertaking or group shall provide progress reports to their supervisory authority if required by the national competent authorities in accordance with Article 37 (10 (b) and (c)).
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Capital Add-Ons, SCR, Solvency Capital Requirement, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Cassandra Hannibal
Life insurance actuary; risk management and economic capital specialist
Paul McCarney
Insurance product strategist; insurance domain expert; extensive experience developing risk assessment frameworks for insurers
Brian Robinson
Actuary; risk management specialist; corporate and capital modelling expert
Previous Article
EIOPA Consults on Various Aspects of Open Insurance FrameworkNext Article
HKMA Keeps Countercyclical Capital Buffer at 1%Related Articles
US Agencies Issue Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.
ECB Issues Multiple Reports and Regulatory Updates for Banks
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.
HKMA Keeps List of D-SIBs Unchanged, Makes Other Announcements
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.
EU Issues FAQs on Taxonomy Regulation, Rules Under CRD, FICOD and SFDR
The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.
CBIRC Revises Measures on Corporate Governance Supervision
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.
HKMA Publications Address Sustainability Issues in Financial Sector
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.
EBA Updates Address Basel and NPL Requirements for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.
ESMA Publishes 2022 ESEF XBRL Taxonomy and Conformance Suite
The General Board of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), at its December meeting, issued an updated risk assessment via the quarterly risk dashboard and held discussions on key policy priorities to address the systemic risks in the European Union.
FCA Sets up ESG Committee, Imposes Penalties, and Issues Other Updates
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking comments, until December 21, 2022, on the draft guidance for firms to support existing mortgage borrowers.
FSB Reports Assess NBFI Sector and Progress on LIBOR Transition
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that assesses progress on the transition from the Interbank Offered Rates, or IBORs, to overnight risk-free rates as well as a report that assesses global trends in the non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) sector.
