EIOPA Recommends Dividend Distributions Within Thresholds of Prudency
EIOPA published a report that examines the financial stability risks in the European insurance and pension sector. Results of EIOPA's qualitative survey among national competent authorities suggest that both international and country-specific macroeconomic conditions pose significant concerns, with corporate bond downgrades being identified as a key risk for the insurance sector. Additionally, given the latest macroeconomic developments and ongoing uncertainties, an increase in liquidity risk cannot be ruled out looking ahead. Based on its risk assessment, EIOPA recommends to insurers that any dividend distributions should not exceed thresholds of prudency.
The EIOPA report highlights that, apart from the prolonged period of ultra-low rates, credit risk, equity, and property risk are also relevant for the sectors. The low profitability of investments as well as insurers’ underwriting profitability driven by low premium growth pose potential concerns. However, EIOPA notes that European insurers have been able to withstand the dramatic situation as, in particular, the Solvency II regime helped them to better align capital to risk, build-up resilience, and enhance their risk management practices. While risks surrounding the economic growth outlook remain high, they appear to have become less pronounced and there are the first signs that the near-term impact on insurers’ financial position could be captured within the Solvency II confidence levels. Nonetheless, uncertainty remains high and it is key that insurers act to preserve their capital positions in balance with the protection of policyholders and beneficiaries.
Therefore, EIOPA strongly recommends insurers to maintain extreme caution and prudence within their capital management. Any dividend distributions, share buy-backs, or variable remunerations should not exceed thresholds of prudency and institutions should ensure that the resulting reduction in the quantity or quality of their own funds remains at levels appropriate to the current levels of risk. Supervisory authorities should ensure that insurers' assessment of the overall solvency needs is forward-looking while accounting for the current level of uncertainty on the depth, magnitude, and duration of the impact of COVID-19 in financial markets and for the repercussions of that uncertainty in their business models and solvency, liquidity, and financial position.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Financial Stability Report, COVID-19, Solvency Capital Requirement, Liquidity Risk, Corporate Bonds, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Paul McCarney
Insurance product strategist; insurance domain expert; extensive experience developing risk assessment frameworks for insurers
Karen Moss
Senior practitioner in asset and liability management (ALM) and liquidity risk who assists banking clients in advancing their treasury and balance sheet management objectives
Brian Robinson
Actuary; risk management specialist; corporate and capital modelling expert
Previous Article
EC Sets Out Legislative Priorities for Financial Sector for 2021Related Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.