EIOPA Issues Annual Report on Use of Capital Add-Ons Under Solvency II
EIOPA published the annual report on the use of capital add-ons by the national competent authorities under Solvency II. The objective of the capital add-on measure is to ensure that the regulatory capital requirements reflect the risk profile of the undertaking or of the group. The analysis in this report is based on the 2018 year-end Solvency II quantitative reporting templates (QRTs) submitted by solo undertakings or groups from the 31 member states of the European Economic Area to their national competent authorities. The analysis also draws on a survey that entailed both qualitative and quantitative questions on the use of capital add-ons.
During 2018, eight national competent authorities set capital add-ons to 21 solo undertakings, out of the 2,819 (re)insurance undertakings under the Solvency II Directive in the European Economic Area. These include 10 non-life undertakings, eight life undertakings, two reinsurers, and one composite undertaking. However, in 2017, six national competent authorities had set capital add-ons for a total of 23 solo undertakings. Although the overall number of capital add-ons is extremely low and has decreased slightly from 2017 to 2018, two more authorities made use of this tool in 2018.
The amount of capital add-ons imposed on undertakings using the standard formula remains very low overall in 2018, accounting for 1% of the total Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR). However, the amount of capital add-on is not insignificant when considering the amount at the individual level. In sum, as of year-end 2018, the weight of the capital add-on increased to 32% (30% in 2017) when looking at the amount of capital add-ons as a percentage of the total SCR for the undertakings using the standard formula with capital add-ons. The distribution of the capital add-ons as a percentage of the total SCR in 2018 for undertakings that imposed capital add-ons varied substantially once more. In 2018, the largest percentage was 80% (83% in 2017) whereas the smallest percentage rounded close to 0% (1% in 2017).
The Solvency II Directive states that the capital add-on should be reviewed at least once a year by the supervisory authority and be removed when the undertaking has remedied the deficiencies that led to its imposition. According to the regulatory framework, capital add-ons are to be used as a measure of last resort, when they are exceptional and transitory and should be considered only when other supervisory measures have failed, are unlikely to succeed, or are not feasible. This context contributed to the current limited use of this tool, with national competent authorities recognizing that additional capital add-ons should have been set from a prudential point of view but that they had not done so because of the complexity of the process. Thus, a streamlining or simplification of the process for setting capital add-ons would allow a better use of this tool.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Capital Add-Ons, Quantitative Reporting Templates, SCR, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Paul McCarney
Insurance product strategist; insurance domain expert; extensive experience developing risk assessment frameworks for insurers
Brian Robinson
Actuary; risk management specialist; corporate and capital modelling expert
Previous Article
IASB Issues Updates of Meetings for April 2019Next Article
MAS Consults on Amendments to the Banking ActRelated Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
