ECB published its opinion (CON/2018/36) on the review of prudential treatment of investment firms. In January 2018, ECB had received requests from the European Parliament and the Council of the EU, respectively, for an opinion on a proposal for a Regulation on the prudential requirements of investment firms and amending Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (No 575/2013), Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation or MiFIR (No 600/2014), and EU Regulation No 1093/2010 (regulation establishing EBA), along with a proposal for a Directive on the prudential supervision of investment firms and amending the fourth Capital Requirements Directive or CRD IV (Directive 2013/36/EU) and Markets in Financial Instruments Directive or MiFID (Directive 2014/65/EU). Overall, ECB supports the objective of the proposed acts in setting out a prudential framework that is better adapted to the risks and business models of different types of investment firms.
The opinion states that ECB generally supports the purpose of subjecting systemically important investment firms to the same prudential rules as credit institutions; however, the proposed acts should be carefully assessed in order to avoid unintended consequences for other Union legal acts due to the change in the definition of credit institutions. This opinion highlights in particular certain implications for the statistics regime. However, such effects are not limited to the statistics framework. Currently, only credit institutions can be eligible counterparties for Eurosystem monetary policy operations. The possible consequences of an inclusion of Class 1 investment firms in the definition of "credit institution" will need to be carefully assessed by ECB.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, MiFID/MiFIR, CRR/CRD, Opinion, CON/2018/36, ECB
Next ArticleEBA Consults on DPM 2.9 for Supervisory Reporting
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.