ISDA and Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the interim report on climate benchmarks and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures of benchmarks by the EU Technical Expert Group (TEG) on sustainable finance. ISDA-AFME discusses the need for flexibility in benchmark methodologies and proportionality in relation to ESG disclosure requirements under the EU Benchmarks Regulation.
Proportionality in the European Benchmarks Regulation shall apply in relation to ESG disclosures for non-ESG benchmarks. ISDA and AFME would welcome that the requirements for non-significant benchmarks in relation to ESG criteria and carbon emissions disclosures should follow a consistent proportionality approach—that is, ESG disclosure requirements for significant benchmarks shall be more comprehensive than for non-significant benchmarks. ISDA and AFME would welcome the TEG final report to reflect this proportionality, as disclosure of ESG factors and Key Performance Indicator (KPIs) should be in the form of guidelines rather than being mandatory for non-significant benchmarks.
Differentiation by asset class, type of benchmarks, and investor need is necessary for effective ESG disclosures. Given the characteristics and diversity of benchmarks, ISDA and AFME welcome the TEG approach to adapt disclosure requirements to different asset classes. ISDA and AFME welcome that derivative instruments for the transfer of credit risk, such as credit default swaps or CDS, should not apply ESG disclosure, agreeing with the TEG analysis that setting any ESG disclosures for a CDS index would essentially require disclosing the characteristics of a second-level structured product. ISDA and AFME support an exemption of the ESG disclosures for all derivatives benchmarks that do not specifically pursue ESG objectives. ISDA and AFME would like to call on EC to consider the different types of investment styles when preparing the delegated act on minimum requirements for ESG disclosure.
Availability of high-quality and affordable data needs to be enhanced. ISDA and AFME support the TEG recommendation for a non-disclosure option in the template for the methodology and the benchmark statement. This is also in line with the primary legislation (level 1 text of the EU Benchmarks Regulation). If ESG data disclosure requirements are too rigid, the required growth of the ESG market, needed to fulfill the overarching objective of the sustainable finance agenda may be jeopardized. To facilitate the availability of data, the co-legislators and the EC, depending on the type of legislation, shall align disclosure requirements resulting from other financial services legislation with the requirements of the Benchmarks Regulation.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Climate Benchmarks, ESG, Disclosures, Proportionality, Benchmarks Regulation, AFME, ISDA
Previous ArticleFSB Report Examines Sources of Regulatory Gaps on Crypto-Assets
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.