ISDA and Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the interim report on climate benchmarks and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures of benchmarks by the EU Technical Expert Group (TEG) on sustainable finance. ISDA-AFME discusses the need for flexibility in benchmark methodologies and proportionality in relation to ESG disclosure requirements under the EU Benchmarks Regulation.
Proportionality in the European Benchmarks Regulation shall apply in relation to ESG disclosures for non-ESG benchmarks. ISDA and AFME would welcome that the requirements for non-significant benchmarks in relation to ESG criteria and carbon emissions disclosures should follow a consistent proportionality approach—that is, ESG disclosure requirements for significant benchmarks shall be more comprehensive than for non-significant benchmarks. ISDA and AFME would welcome the TEG final report to reflect this proportionality, as disclosure of ESG factors and Key Performance Indicator (KPIs) should be in the form of guidelines rather than being mandatory for non-significant benchmarks.
Differentiation by asset class, type of benchmarks, and investor need is necessary for effective ESG disclosures. Given the characteristics and diversity of benchmarks, ISDA and AFME welcome the TEG approach to adapt disclosure requirements to different asset classes. ISDA and AFME welcome that derivative instruments for the transfer of credit risk, such as credit default swaps or CDS, should not apply ESG disclosure, agreeing with the TEG analysis that setting any ESG disclosures for a CDS index would essentially require disclosing the characteristics of a second-level structured product. ISDA and AFME support an exemption of the ESG disclosures for all derivatives benchmarks that do not specifically pursue ESG objectives. ISDA and AFME would like to call on EC to consider the different types of investment styles when preparing the delegated act on minimum requirements for ESG disclosure.
Availability of high-quality and affordable data needs to be enhanced. ISDA and AFME support the TEG recommendation for a non-disclosure option in the template for the methodology and the benchmark statement. This is also in line with the primary legislation (level 1 text of the EU Benchmarks Regulation). If ESG data disclosure requirements are too rigid, the required growth of the ESG market, needed to fulfill the overarching objective of the sustainable finance agenda may be jeopardized. To facilitate the availability of data, the co-legislators and the EC, depending on the type of legislation, shall align disclosure requirements resulting from other financial services legislation with the requirements of the Benchmarks Regulation.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Climate Benchmarks, ESG, Disclosures, Proportionality, Benchmarks Regulation, AFME, ISDA
Previous ArticleBNM Consults on Policy Framework for D-SIBs
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.