General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
November 02, 2017

OFR published a working paper that examines the likelihood that a central counterparty (CCP) will default after a severe credit shock. The paper used credit default swap (CDS) data to estimate the direct and indirect effects of a default by CCP in derivatives trades. The paper concludes that a CCP could be more vulnerable to failure than conventional stress tests have shown.

The paper proposes a general framework for estimating the likelihood of default by central counterparties (CCP) in derivatives markets. Unlike conventional stress testing approaches, which estimate the ability of a CCP to withstand nonpayment by its two largest counterparties, the authors studied the direct and indirect effects of nonpayment by members and/or their clients through the full network of exposures. The authors illustrate the approach for the CDS market under shocks that are similar in magnitude to the FED’s 2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review trading book shock. The analysis indicates that conventional stress testing approaches may underestimate the potential vulnerability of the main CCP for this market.  

The paper summarizes the protections that the CCP has in place to deal with defaults by its members and examines the way the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) data is used to derive variation margin payment demands and failure probabilities under the CCAR shock. The paper then analyzes the Cover 2 standard in the context of the CCAR shock. This analysis suggests that the CCP’s default fund is adequate to cover the defaults of its two largest members; however, a different conclusion emerges when network contagion is taken into account. The paper introduces the contagion model, which traces how payment delinquencies by some firms can escalate as they cascade through the network of CDS exposures. The sensitivity of the model to different values for the shock and stress transmission parameters is also demonstrated. Next, the paper describes a probabilistic model that allows the estimation of the probability of a CCP failure relative to the probability of a member’s failure, while making minimal assumptions about the degree of correlation among member failure rates. This model was used to estimate the probability that a CCP would default during a stress of similar magnitude to the CCAR shock. 

 

Related Link: Working Paper (PDF) 

Keywords: Americas, US, Securities, CCP, CCAR, OTC Derivatives, CDS, Stress Testing, Systemic Risk, OFR

Related Insights
News

BoE Publishes the Schedule for Statistical Reporting for 2019

BoE published the updated schedule for statistical reporting for 2019. The reporting institutions use the online statistical data application (OSCA) to submit statistical data to BoE.

January 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SNB Updates Forms on Supervisory Reporting for Banks

SNB published Version 1.7 of reporting forms (AUR_U, AUR_UEA, AUR_UES, AURH_U, AUR_K, AUR_KEA, and AURH_K) and the related documentation for supervisory reporting on an individual and consolidated basis.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Issues Q&A on Estimating Credit Loss Reserves

FASB issued a question-and-answer (Q&A) document that addresses particular issues related to the weighted average remaining maturity (WARM) method for estimating the allowance for credit losses.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Updates Reporting and Supplemental Instructions for Form FR Y-9C

FED published the updated reporting instructions and supplemental instructions for the FR Y-9C reporting form. The reporting frequency for FR Y-9C is quarterly, as of the last calendar day of the quarter.

January 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Updates Policy on Liquidity Reporting Under FSA047/048 and PRA110

PRA published the policy statement PS1/19 that provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/18 titled "Liquidity reporting: FSA047 and FSA048" and the proposal in CP16/18, which intended to correct the level of consolidation of the PRA110 reporting requirements.

January 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Proposes to Amend Company-Run Stress Testing Requirements

FED proposed to modify company-run stress testing requirements to conform with the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

January 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2468