PRA published a letter from Sid Malik, the Head of Division of Life Insurance and Pensions Risk Division, to Chief Actuaries of life insurers. In the letter, PRA shared its observations from regulatory activities of insurers in the past 12 months and highlighted the areas in which further work is anticipated in the coming year. Further work is anticipated in the areas of model drift, proxy modeling, treatment of expenses in Solvency II technical provisions, and firms' monitoring of matching adjustment portfolios.
In the past year, PRA has continued to focus the reviews on ensuring that appropriate prudential standards are maintained. The letter highlights following key areas where further industry-wide PRA activity is expected in the next 12 months:
- Model Drift—PRA is carefully monitoring model drift using supervisory tools developed in recent years. While PRA recognizes the limitations of model drift metrics and takes into account additional factors that may legitimately explain the potential model drift, this is not a trend that is expected to continue over time. PRA encourages firms to develop their own model drift measures and not to limit the model drift analysis to the metrics.
- Proxy modeling—Most internal model life insurers use a proxy model to calculate their Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) and recently a sample of firms have been surveyed in this area. Given the wide range of practices observed in the survey, PRA is considering whether to issue a consultation on proposed expectations for how firms can continue to meet internal model tests and standards in respect of proxy modeling.
- Treatment of expenses in Solvency II technical provisions and SCR—PRA has observed a variety of approaches to the projection of expenses in technical provisions and the treatment of fixed overheads in both the standard formula and the internal model SCR calculations. This appears to be a challenge across the European economic area. EIOPA has issued two question and answer responses on the interpretation of the Level 2 text. PRA considers that it is a good practice to reflect the principles underlying these responses when determining the expense projections for all firms within technical provisions and in the capital requirement calculation. PRA plans to undertake some work in this area across the life insurance sector during 2019.
- Firms’ monitoring of matching adjustment portfolios—In late 2018, an industry-wide review by PRA identified a broad range in the quality of firms’ internal management information for monitoring regulatory compliance in relation to the matching adjustment. Chief Actuaries may wish to consider the adequacy of how their firm monitors the trading of matching adjustment assets and collateral management. Given the significance of matching-adjustment approval, PRA is contemplating further reviews in this area to ensure firms are adequately monitoring their own compliance.
Annex 1 to the letter further details these above-mentioned areas where PRA activity is expected in the next 12 months while Annex 2 serves as a reminder on other important areas relevant for life insurers, the areas in which PRA has issued policy or communications. These other areas include climate change, the impact of moving from LIBOR to SONIA, equity release mortgages and other illiquid assets, Solvency II technical provisions, and transitional measures for technical provisions simplification. Finally, Annex 3 to the letter offers additional information on the "bottom up" model drift metrics.
Related Link: Letter
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, SCR, Solvency II, Model Drift, Proxy Modelling, Matching Adjustment, LIBOR, SONIA, Life Insurance, PRA
Previous ArticleOCC Bulletin on Risk Management Guidance for Home Mortgage Lending
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.