General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
February 01, 2019

ECB published aggregate results for the 2018 stress test for all participating banks under its supervision. The results show that the 87 banks directly supervised by ECB have become more resilient to financial shocks over the past two years.

Despite a more severe adverse scenario than in the 2016 stress test, the average common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio of all 87 banks after a three-year stress period was 10.1%, up from 8.8% two years ago. The results show that the 87 banks directly supervised by ECB have become more resilient to financial shocks over the past two years. Looking at the 54 medium-size banks tested solely by ECB, the results show that they have become better capitalized, increasing their ability to absorb financial shocks. In addition to the EBA sample (33 banks), which covers about 70% of euro area banking assets, they represent a further 9% of banking assets in the euro area. Despite increased resilience overall among medium-size banks, challenges remain for euro area banks and ECB will monitor the progress of work on business models and legacy issues.

The 87 banks covered in the report include 33 euro area banks that were part of the EU-wide stress test coordinated by EBA. ECB conducted additional stress tests on 54 significant institutions, which it directly supervises and which were not part of the EBA stress test. Both sets of results form this aggregate report. The reference date for the 2018 stress test was December 31, 2017. ECB applied largely the same methodology as EBA when stress testing the 54 medium-size banks. Some significant banks directly supervised by ECB were not part of either stress test, mostly because they are subsidiaries of banks already covered by the EBA exercise or in the process of merging or restructuring. The results of these stress tests will contribute to the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) under the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) 

 

Related Links

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Stress Testing, 2018 EU Stress Testing, SSM, Significant Institutions, EBA, ECB

Related Insights
News

OFR Adopts Data Collection Rule on Centrally Cleared Repo Transactions

OFR adopted a final rule to establish a data collection covering centrally cleared funding transactions in the U.S. repurchase agreement (repo) market.

February 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FHFA Finalizes Rule on Federal Home Loan Bank Capital Requirements

FHFA published, in Federal Register, the final rule to adopt, as its own, portions of the regulations of the Federal Housing Finance Board pertaining to the capital requirements for the Federal Home Loan Banks.

February 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SRB Publishes Framework for Performing Valuations in Resolution

The framework provides independent valuers and the general public with an indication of the expectations of SRB on the principles and methodologies for valuation reports, as set out in the legal framework.

February 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Extend Consultation Period for the Proposed SA-CCR

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) extended the comment period for a proposed rule to update their standards for how firms measure counterparty credit risk posed by derivative contracts.

February 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Extends Consultation Period for Stress Testing Rule

FED has published in the Federal Register a notice proposing amendments to the company run and supervisory stress test rules.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for February 2019

EBA published answers to two questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SEC Proposes Rule on Risk Mitigation Techniques for Uncleared SBS

SEC proposed a rule that would require the application of specific risk-mitigation techniques to portfolios of security-based swaps (SBS) that are not submitted for clearing.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Report Examines Financial Stability Implications of Fintech

FSB published a report that assesses fintech-related market developments and their potential implications for financial stability.

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Amend Regulatory Capital Rule to Allow Phase-In for CECL

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted the final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes banking organizations’ implementation of the current expected credit losses (CECL) methodology.

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Proposes Taxonomy Improvements for the Credit Losses Standard

FASB proposed the taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Updates on Targeted Transition Relief for Topic 326 (Financial Instruments—Credit Losses) and Topic 805 (on Business Combinations—Revenue from Contracts with Customers).

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2617