EIOPA Issues Annual Report on Use of Capital Add-Ons Under Solvency II
EIOPA published the annual report on the use of capital add-ons by the national competent authorities under Solvency II. The objective of the capital add-on measure is to ensure that the regulatory capital requirements reflect the risk profile of the undertaking or of the group. The analysis in this report is based on the 2018 year-end Solvency II quantitative reporting templates (QRTs) submitted by solo undertakings or groups from the 31 member states of the European Economic Area to their national competent authorities. The analysis also draws on a survey that entailed both qualitative and quantitative questions on the use of capital add-ons.
During 2018, eight national competent authorities set capital add-ons to 21 solo undertakings, out of the 2,819 (re)insurance undertakings under the Solvency II Directive in the European Economic Area. These include 10 non-life undertakings, eight life undertakings, two reinsurers, and one composite undertaking. However, in 2017, six national competent authorities had set capital add-ons for a total of 23 solo undertakings. Although the overall number of capital add-ons is extremely low and has decreased slightly from 2017 to 2018, two more authorities made use of this tool in 2018.
The amount of capital add-ons imposed on undertakings using the standard formula remains very low overall in 2018, accounting for 1% of the total Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR). However, the amount of capital add-on is not insignificant when considering the amount at the individual level. In sum, as of year-end 2018, the weight of the capital add-on increased to 32% (30% in 2017) when looking at the amount of capital add-ons as a percentage of the total SCR for the undertakings using the standard formula with capital add-ons. The distribution of the capital add-ons as a percentage of the total SCR in 2018 for undertakings that imposed capital add-ons varied substantially once more. In 2018, the largest percentage was 80% (83% in 2017) whereas the smallest percentage rounded close to 0% (1% in 2017).
The Solvency II Directive states that the capital add-on should be reviewed at least once a year by the supervisory authority and be removed when the undertaking has remedied the deficiencies that led to its imposition. According to the regulatory framework, capital add-ons are to be used as a measure of last resort, when they are exceptional and transitory and should be considered only when other supervisory measures have failed, are unlikely to succeed, or are not feasible. This context contributed to the current limited use of this tool, with national competent authorities recognizing that additional capital add-ons should have been set from a prudential point of view but that they had not done so because of the complexity of the process. Thus, a streamlining or simplification of the process for setting capital add-ons would allow a better use of this tool.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Capital Add-Ons, Quantitative Reporting Templates, SCR, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Paul McCarney
Insurance product strategist; insurance domain expert; extensive experience developing risk assessment frameworks for insurers
Brian Robinson
Actuary; risk management specialist; corporate and capital modelling expert
Previous Article
IASB Issues Updates of Meetings for April 2019Next Article
MAS Consults on Amendments to the Banking ActRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
