BCBS published the supplemental guidelines to the 2014 guidance on external audits of banks, following the implementation of expected credit loss (ECL) accounting frameworks in various jurisdictions. The implementation of these frameworks have brought about significant changes for banks and their external auditors. The guidelines set out expectations of BCBS for the audit of the financial statements of a bank, specifically in relation to the audit of ECL estimates, to help the audit committee effectively discharge its external audit responsibilities. In addition to elaborating on these expectations in the context of the key components of ECL, the guidelines set out questions that an audit committee may ask the external auditor.
The supplemental note deals with the audit of the ECL accounting estimate within the overall financial statement audit. It elaborates on the 2014 guidance. While the 2014 guidance remains relevant, the changes brought about by ECL frameworks mean that further guidance is required. The 2014 guidance is structured around five key themes relevant to the quality of auditing the ECL estimate. The key themes for audit quality are professional skepticism and management bias, assessment of risks of material misstatement, internal control, use of experts, and audit evidence. The key components of the ECL estimate are forecasts and forward-looking information, macroeconomic scenarios and weighting, models, significant increase in credit risk criteria, and disclosure. BCBS expects that an external auditor will consider these components, among others, throughout the different stages of its audit of the ECL estimate and related disclosures, as these components are where the accounting and audit may be particularly challenging. According to the expectations set out by BCBS, an external auditor is expected to:
- Promote an environment conducive to exercising professional skepticism in the audit of ECL by planning, staffing, and managing the audit engagement appropriately
- Exercise, and provide evidence that they exercised, a high degree of professional skepticism at all stages of the audit of ECL.
- Focus on understanding banks’ lending business models, risk appetite and exposures, credit risk management practices, business segments, and geographical location, when identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement related to the audit of ECL
- Test the operating effectiveness of internal controls on which the external auditor plans to rely, as substantive procedures alone usually cannot provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the ECL estimate is free of material misstatement
- Evaluate internal controls over the ECL estimate sufficiently early in the audit process to ensure that an effective audit approach can be undertaken, including cases where the controls tested are ineffective
- Make use of specialized skills, which will require the use of an auditor’s experts to audit ECL effectively
- Determine that any experts used have the competence to carry out the work asked of them and that the external auditor will ensure the work has been properly scoped and evaluated, to contribute to the external auditor’s assessment of the reasonableness of the ECL estimate and related disclosures
- Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether the ECL estimate and related disclosures in the financial statements are reasonable in the context of the applicable ECL framework
- Obtain more persuasive evidence to support the audit of the ECL estimate and related disclosures because of the significant risks of material misstatement
Keywords: International, Banking, Accounting, ECL, External Audit, Internal Control, Credit Risk, Disclosures, Governance, IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, BCBS
Previous ArticleSARB Circular on Exposures Secured by Residential Mortgage Bonds
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).