EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk. To ensure the financial resilience of insurers and reinsurers covering natural catastrophes, the solvency capital requirement (SCR) for natural catastrophe underwriting risk needs to remain appropriate in light of climate change. To this end, EIOPA is proposing possible methodological steps and process changes to integrate climate change in the calculation of natural catastrophe risk SCR calibration. Comments on the discussion paper are due by February 26, 2021, post which EIOPA expects to consider the feedback received and to publish the final report in the Summer of 2021.
This discussion paper is a follow-up to the opinion on sustainability within Solvency II, which EIOPA published in September 2019; the opinion concluded that there is a need to consider if, and how, climate change-related perils could be better captured in the Solvency II framework under the natural catastrophe risk submodule. In this discussion paper, EIOPA proposes the following possible methodological steps to include climate change in the natural catastrophe SCR Calibration:
- Use natural catastrophe models that explicitly consider climate change to recalibrate the natural catastrophe standard formula parameters
- Assess whether new countries should be added to the countries currently covered by the standard formula
- Assess the need to include new perils to the perils currently covered by the standard formula
- Asses the need to include other insurance activities to the ones currently covered by the standard formula
- Add a loading factor for specific perils or regions
- Capture climate change in the spatial and peril correlation
As part of the process changes to include climate change in the natural catastrophe SCR calibration, EIOPA proposes to formalize an approach to re-assess current natural catastrophe SCR parameters on a regular basis and to perform regular calibrations. The reassessment would need to consider parameters such as new legislation, evidence-based requests from stakeholders for the recalibration of a certain peril or region, changes in national insurance schemes (new pools for example), and inadequate loss ratio (which might not directly link to climate change but still have important consequences). Every 3 to 5 years experts from national competent authorities, natural catastrophe insurance, natural catastrophe modelers, and climatologists would reassess the parameters for all perils or regions in the standard formula and stress the potential need for a recalibration of certain perils or regions. For this, the following criteria could be considered:
- Model changes due to climate change or other reasons
- New scientific evidence on climate change
- Changes in exposure and/or vulnerability
- Materiality of the change
- New insurance products
Comment Due Date: February 26, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Sustainable Finance, SCR, Solvency Capital Requirement, Catastrophe Risk, EIOPA
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular, along with the reporting form and instructions, for self-assessment, by authorized institutions, of compliance with the Code of Banking Practice 2021.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) decided to register European DataWarehouse Ltd and SecRep Limited as securitization repositories under the UK Securitization Regulation, with effect from January 17, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) updated the list of authorized deposit-taking institutions, granting license to Barclays Bank PLC and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to operate as foreign authorized deposit-taking institutions under the Banking Act 1959.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the Delegated Regulation 2015/35, which supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published an Opinion on the scale and impact of de-risking in European Union and the steps that competent authorities should take to tackle unwarranted de-risking.