EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk. To ensure the financial resilience of insurers and reinsurers covering natural catastrophes, the solvency capital requirement (SCR) for natural catastrophe underwriting risk needs to remain appropriate in light of climate change. To this end, EIOPA is proposing possible methodological steps and process changes to integrate climate change in the calculation of natural catastrophe risk SCR calibration. Comments on the discussion paper are due by February 26, 2021, post which EIOPA expects to consider the feedback received and to publish the final report in the Summer of 2021.
This discussion paper is a follow-up to the opinion on sustainability within Solvency II, which EIOPA published in September 2019; the opinion concluded that there is a need to consider if, and how, climate change-related perils could be better captured in the Solvency II framework under the natural catastrophe risk submodule. In this discussion paper, EIOPA proposes the following possible methodological steps to include climate change in the natural catastrophe SCR Calibration:
- Use natural catastrophe models that explicitly consider climate change to recalibrate the natural catastrophe standard formula parameters
- Assess whether new countries should be added to the countries currently covered by the standard formula
- Assess the need to include new perils to the perils currently covered by the standard formula
- Asses the need to include other insurance activities to the ones currently covered by the standard formula
- Add a loading factor for specific perils or regions
- Capture climate change in the spatial and peril correlation
As part of the process changes to include climate change in the natural catastrophe SCR calibration, EIOPA proposes to formalize an approach to re-assess current natural catastrophe SCR parameters on a regular basis and to perform regular calibrations. The reassessment would need to consider parameters such as new legislation, evidence-based requests from stakeholders for the recalibration of a certain peril or region, changes in national insurance schemes (new pools for example), and inadequate loss ratio (which might not directly link to climate change but still have important consequences). Every 3 to 5 years experts from national competent authorities, natural catastrophe insurance, natural catastrophe modelers, and climatologists would reassess the parameters for all perils or regions in the standard formula and stress the potential need for a recalibration of certain perils or regions. For this, the following criteria could be considered:
- Model changes due to climate change or other reasons
- New scientific evidence on climate change
- Changes in exposure and/or vulnerability
- Materiality of the change
- New insurance products
Comment Due Date: February 26, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Sustainable Finance, SCR, Solvency Capital Requirement, Catastrophe Risk, EIOPA
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.