Featured Product

    Sabine Lautenschläger of ECB on Way Forward for Banking Supervision

    September 28, 2017

    Sabine Lautenschläger, Member of the ECB Executive Board and Vice-Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board, spoke at the ESE Conference 2017 in Vienna. She examined the achievements, challenges, and the way forward for the banking supervision in Europe. During the discussion, she focused on three issues: the rulebook for banks and how it relates to supervision; the toolbox that supervisors have at their disposal; and the role of the market.

    Ms. Lautenschläger discussed creating a level playing field and harmonizing the bank rulebook in the context of differences arising from national options and discretions. She advises that “we must further harmonize the rulebook. Instead of EU Directives, we should rely more on EU Regulations, which can be directly applied in all member states. We should deal with the remaining O&Ds and we should stop passing more and more national laws, especially those which apply to banks that are supervised at European level. Instead, we should strive to cut down on some of these national laws, such as those concerning the reporting requirements that have become redundant as a result of the European Reporting Framework. Scrapping such laws would increase efficiency and reduce costs for both banks and supervisors.”

    She highlights that “We have harmonized the main tool of banking supervision: the supervisory review and evaluation process, SREP for short.” However, the supervisory toolbox comprises more than the SREP and there are other things that we need to improve. First, there are tools that are applied in different ways in different countries (for example, on-site inspections at banks). Second, there are tools which exist in some countries but not in others (for example, the moratorium tool and deductions from own funds). Third, there are tools that are part of the European toolbox not once but twice, thus causing problems (for example, the overlap between early intervention tools and standard tools). “To sum up, we still need to work on the toolbox of European banking supervisors. We have to expand, harmonize, and streamline it.”

    Ms. Lautenschläger discussed the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) and the supervisory approach of ECB and SRB in the resolution process, also highlighting the recent success in this area in Europe. She emphasized the “need to improve the tools that are needed to actually resolve a bank.” Moratorium is one such tool that still needs to be added to the European toolbox, as per Ms. Lautenschläger. Finally, she opines “that only systemically relevant banks will be resolved at European level. All other banks will be subject to national insolvency regimes. It might thus be warranted to harmonize these regimes across Europe to ensure a level playing field. All the things I just mentioned will have an impact on how supervisors assess and react to the risks of banks and the risks of bank failures.”

     

    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Supervision, SRM, SREP, Options and National Discretions, Moratorium Tool, ECB

    Related Articles
    News

    MAS Amends Notice 610 on Reporting Templates for Banks in Singapore

    MAS published amendments to Notices 610 and 1003 related to submission of statistics and returns, along with the reporting templates and frequently asked questions (FAQs) associated with these Notices.

    January 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Updates Policy Module on Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is issuing, by notice in the Gazette, revised versions of two Supervisory Policy Manual modules as statutory guidelines under section 7(3) of the Banking Ordinance. The Supervisory Policy Manual modules are CA-G-5 on “Supervisory Review Process” and SB-2 on “Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading.”

    January 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Amends Pillar 2 Capital Framework for Banks

    PRA published the policy statement PS2/20 that contains the final amendments to the Pillar 2 framework and provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP5/19 on updates related to Pillar 2 capital framework.

    January 23, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Survey Examines Progress of Central Banks Toward Digital Currency

    BIS published a paper that presents the results of a survey that asked central banks how their plans are developing in the area of central bank digital currency (CBDC).

    January 23, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Proposes to Revise Information Collection Under Market Risk Rule

    FED proposed to revise and extend, for three years, FR 4201, which is the information collection under the market risk capital rule.

    January 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Stay Rules on Financial Contracts Under FIRO

    HKMA published proposals for making rules related to contractual stays on termination rights in financial contracts for authorized institutions under FIRO or the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628).

    January 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Amends Notices on Minimum Liquid Asset Requirements for Banks

    MAS published amendments to Notices 1015, 613, and 649 related to the minimum liquid assets (MLA) requirements.

    January 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Publishes Submission on Fintech and Regtech

    APRA published its submission, to the Senate Select Committee, on financial technology and regulatory technology.

    January 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI to Implement Operational Risk Capital Rules for Banks in Q1 2022

    OSFI decided to move domestic implementation of the revised Basel III operational risk capital requirements from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2022.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Consults on Guideline on Threshold for Credit Obligations Past Due

    ECB published a draft guideline, along with the frequently asked questions (FAQs), on the definition of the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4541