APRA released updated guidance, in the form of an Information Paper, on the use of shared computing services, such as cloud, by APRA-regulated entities. The new paper acknowledges that advancements in cloud computing service offerings over the past three years have improved the ability of APRA-regulated entities to manage the risks involved. However, it also emphasizes the need for entities to be mindful of the differing levels of responsibility for operating and managing these arrangements.
This Information Paper is relevant for a broad audience including boards, senior management, risk management, technical specialists, and internal audit. APRA has a number of existing prudential standards and practice guides that are pertinent to cloud computing services. These Prudential Standards and Prudential Practice Guides include CPS 231 Outsourcing; SPS 231 Outsourcing; HPS231 Outsourcing; PPG 231 Outsourcing; SPG 231 Outsourcing; CPS 232 Business Continuity Management; SPS 232 Business Continuity Management; CPG 233 Pandemic Planning; (draft) CPS 234 Information Security, CPG 234 Management of Security Risk in Information and Information Technology; and CPG 235 Managing Data Risk. This Information Paper applies the concepts included in these standards and guides and APRA intends to reflect the principles in this paper in future guidance updates. For the purpose of this paper, APRA has classified these risks into three broad categories: low, heightened, and extreme.
- For arrangements with low inherent risk not involving offshoring, APRA would not expect an APRA-regulated entity to consult with APRA prior to entering into the arrangement.
- For arrangements with heightened risk, APRA would expect to be consulted after the APRA-regulated entity’s internal governance process is completed.
- For arrangements involving extreme inherent risk, APRA encourages earlier engagement as these arrangements will be subjected to a higher level of scrutiny.
The new Information Paper updates information on prudential considerations and key principles issued to APRA-regulated entities in July 2015. It has been developed in response to the growing use of the cloud by APRA-regulated entities for higher inherent risk activities and in response to the observed areas of weakness in how entities approach and manage these risks. APRA-regulated entities should note that while this information paper does not constitute formal regulation, APRA intends to incorporate the better practices described in the paper into prudential standards and practice guides in the future. Any such changes will be subject to APRA’s normal processes of consultation.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Fintech, Cloud Computing, Guidance, APRA
Previous ArticleEBA Publishes Revised List of Validation Rules for Reporting
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.