FINMA published a supplement to its initial coin offerings (ICOs) guidelines, outlining the treatment for stablecoins under the Swiss supervisory law. The treatment of stablecoins under supervisory law follows the existing approach taken to blockchain-based tokens: the focus is on the economic function and the purpose of a token (substance over form). The requirements under supervisory law may differ depending on which assets back the stablecoin and on the legal rights of its holders. FINMA confirmed that it has received a request from the Geneva-based Libra Association for an assessment of how the supervisory authority would classify the planned Libra project, including the issuance of a stablecoin under the Swiss supervisory law. Hence, FINMA is providing an initial indication of how it would apply the relevant Swiss regulation.
FINMA provides an indicative classification of the project under Swiss supervisory law on the basis of the information available so far:
- In Switzerland, such a project would fall under the financial market infrastructure regulation. The project, as it is presently envisaged, would require a payment system license from FINMA, on the basis of the Financial Market Infrastructure Act (FMIA).
- Regulatory requirements for payment systems in Switzerland are based on the prevailing international standards, particularly the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI). These requirements also apply to the management of cyber risks.
- A Swiss payment system is automatically subject to the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The highest international anti-money laundering standards would need to be ensured throughout the entire ecosystem of the project. Such an ecosystem must be immune against elevated money laundering risks.
- Under the FMIA, all additional services that increase the risks of a payment system must be subject to corresponding additional requirements. This means that all the potential risks of a Swiss payment system, including bank-like risks, can be addressed by imposing appropriate requirements in line with the maxim "same risks, same rules." Due to the issuance of Libra payment tokens, services planned by the Libra project would clearly go beyond those of a pure payment system and would, therefore, be subject to such additional requirements.
- These additional requirements would relate in particular to capital allocation (for credit, market, and operational risks), risk concentration, and liquidity as well as the management of the Libra reserve.
- The additional requirements would be based on recognized standards for similar activities in the financial markets and would need to reflect the dimension of the project. A Swiss payment system license would thereby permit a combination of the strengths of banking and infrastructure regulation.
A necessary condition for being granted a license as a payment system would be that the returns and risks associated with the management of the reserve were borne entirely by the Libra Association and not—as in the case of a fund provider—by the stablecoin holders.
Keywords: Europe, Switzerland, Banking, Securities, Libra, Stablecoins, Initial Coin Offerings, Cryptocurrency, PFMI, Fintech, FINMA
Previous ArticleAPRA Updates Implementation Plan for New Data Collection Solution
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.