Featured Product

    APRA Survey Reveals Some Entities Find Regulatory Burden Too High

    September 07, 2021

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published results of the 2021 stakeholder biennial survey of regulated entities as well as knowledgeable observers, such as auditors, actuaries, and industry associations. APRA undertakes the biennial stakeholder surveys to help assess its performance and effectiveness. The results reveal that the regulatory and supervisory approaches of APRA have positively impacted the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries during COVID-19 crisis. The survey indicates that a quarter of the regulated entities feel that regulatory burden on the entity is too high versus the benefit gained by the entity. Moreover, almost one-third of the respondents believe that APRA collects too much statistical data.

    For this seventh stakeholder survey since 2009, APRA had engaged Orima Research, which conducted the survey over six weeks during May 2021 and June 2021. The survey received responses from 297 regulated entities and 31 knowledgeable observers. The survey found that 95% of the regulated entities believe that APRA effectively communicated its changing expectations during the COVID-19 crisis, while 87% agree that the policy responses of APRA were appropriate and helpful to their entity during the pandemic. More than 95% of the entities believe that the APRA supervision helps to protect both their industry and the financial well-being of the Australian community. Among other key findings:

    • 95% agree that APRA’s public communications are clear and effective
    • 93% agree that APRA is effective in identifying risks across industry
    • 87% agree that APRA’s increased focus on risk culture had a positive impact on their entity

    Across the first seven editions of the survey, the results have been consistently strong, with small improvements recorded in 2021 (versus 2019) among the regulated entities. General patterns observed in the 2021 results are that the views of regulated entities are equal to or more positive than those of the knowledgeable observers, a pattern that has been observed previously. Among the regulated entities, in 2021, the views of entities that are part of a group are generally broadly in line with the entities that are not part of a group. Most statistically significant changes observed among regulated entities from 2019 to 2021 are upward, whereas statistically significant changes among knowledgeable observers were generally slightly downward.


    Related Links

    Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Survey Results, Regulated Entities, COVID-19, Stakeholder Survey, Regulatory Burden, Statistical Reporting, APRA

    Related Articles

    FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS

    The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.

    March 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks

    The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.

    March 13, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.

    March 12, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.

    March 07, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending

    BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.

    March 03, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks

    The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.

    March 02, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.

    February 28, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms

    Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.

    February 28, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    DNB Publishes Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks

    DNB, the central bank of Netherlands, updated the list of additional reporting requests and published additional data quality checks and XBRL-Formula linkbase documents for the first quarter of 2023.

    February 28, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    NBB Sets Out Climate Risk Expectations, Issues Reporting Updates

    The National Bank of Belgium (NBB) published a communication on climate-related and environmental risks, issued an update on XBRL reporting

    February 24, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8798