MAS published a report on the thematic assessment of credit review standards and practices of corporate lending business. The assessment found that the banks had established policies and processes to monitor and manage the exposures of their corporate borrowers. However, there is room to improve the robustness of their credit grading, credit monitoring, and portfolio management processes.
MAS conducted the thematic review between October 2016 and June 2017. The thematic review focused on assessing the following for banks:
- Credit grading standards and practices against the credit grading requirements under MAS Notice 612 on Credit Files, Grading, and Provisioning
- Credit monitoring framework and controls
- Loan portfolio management framework and processes
The review found that while the Notice 612 sets out both quantitative and qualitative criteria for credit grading, there were instances where banks had placed stronger emphasis on quantitative factors, such as repayment conduct, in determining the credit grade without adequate consideration of the qualitative factors. There were also instances of restructured loans not being classified appropriately in line with the requirements of the Notice. The watch-list process could be enhanced for more effective identification and management of accounts, with signs of credit weaknesses.
On portfolio management, some banks did not conduct adequate credit stress tests on a regular and timely basis to assess the impact of economic shocks or worrying trends in the local operating environment. Stress test scenarios should also be enhanced to incorporate macroeconomic and industry trends. Furthermore, as credit grades could be one of the inputs used to determine the amount of loan-loss provisions under FRS 109, banks should ensure that their credit grading standards are sufficiently robust. Notwithstanding that the general credit environment has improved, banks should continue to strengthen their credit review standards and practices.
Additionally, some banks conducted a post-mortem on non-performing loans (NPLs) to identify reasons for their deterioration and determine whether there were preemptive actions that could have been taken before the loans turned non-performing. The post-mortem was generally performed by units that were independent of the business such as internal audit and remedial management. The outcome of the reviews was reported to senior management, which would ensure that appropriate and timely actions were taken to rectify the noted weaknesses.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, NPLs, MAS Notice 612, Stress Testing, Corporate Lending, FRS 109, Credit Risk, Credit Grading, MAS
Previous ArticleBoE Publishes Financial Stability Report and Stress Test Results
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.