The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published individual reports on the supervisory independence of competent authorities in their respective sectors. Based on the self-assessment of competent authorities, the three reports highlight that the independence of competent authorities is multi-faceted and dependent on a number of legal, institutional, operational, and cultural factors. The three reports take stock of the competent authorities’ independence along the key areas of operational, financial, and personal independence as well as accountability and transparency. The reports seek to factually represent the arrangements and practices reported by competent authorities, without assessing the independence of individual competent authorities.
The reports set out the following key findings with respect to each area:
- Operational independence. While the vast majority of competent authorities are established as independent bodies, a few are established under the aegis of a ministry and a limited number are required to reply to requests made by certain public bodies, such as Ministers. Not all competent authorities report being in a position to hire staff at the level needed for the fulfilment of their supervisory tasks.
- Financial independence. Almost all competent authorities reported adequate funding. However, a variety of funding models are in operation, with some being subject to centralized government budget rules and a few allowing for the creation of reserves.
- Personal independence. While a framework is in place at most competent authorities, there are differences on aspects such as terms of office and removal conditions for competent authorities’ senior management and board members, management of conflicts of interest, cooling-off periods, and legal protection for staff.
- Transparency and accountability. Competent authorities typically ensure public transparency through the publication of documents such as annual reports or financial statements, disclosing supervisory measures taken, and through duties to report periodically on their activities to a government entity or democratic assembly. Some publish documents in English as a way to enhance transparency.
EBA will use these findings to consider, together with ESMA and EIOPA, how to further develop the monitoring and fostering of supervisory independence. Potential activities might include monitoring supervisory independence through periodic surveys, monitoring conflicts of interest, establishing common EU-wide criteria for supervisory independence, benchmarking/assessment of supervisory independence, and advice on legislative change. The reports can support competent authorities in assessing whether it might be desirable to seek any legislative or regulatory amendment to further improve the framework underpinning their independence. In addition, the reports may be used by the European Commission as input for its own report on the independence of competent authorities, which it is preparing under the review clauses of the ESAs founding regulations.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Competent Authorities, Supervisory Independence, EBA, EIOPA, ESMA, EC, ESAs
Previous ArticleCBIRC and PBC Publish Regulations for Systemically Important Banks
The European Commission (EC) published a public consultation on the review of revised payment services directive (PSD2) and open finance.
The European Commission (EC) has issued two letters mandating the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to jointly propose amendments to the regulatory technical standards under Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation or SFDR.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on convergence of supervisory practices for 2021. Additionally, following a request from the European Commission (EC),
The Farm Credit Administration published, in the Federal Register, the final rule on implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) methodology for allowances
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) looks set to intensify focus on crypto-assets and cyber risk and extended the comment period on the proposed rules to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures for investors.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced reduction in the aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility and issued an update on the operational preparedness for zero and negative market interest rates.
The Commission for the Financial Market (CMF) in Chile published capital adequacy ratios (as of February 2022, January 2022, and December 2021) for 17 banks and for the banking system.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on the European Banking Authority (EBA) guidelines on management of non-performing exposures (NPEs) and forborne exposures.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) updated the implementing technical standards that specify the data collection for the 2023 supervisory benchmarking exercise in relation to the internal approaches used in market risk, credit risk, and IFRS 9 accounting.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a feedback statement on the responses received to the consultation on blockchain and smart contracts in insurance.