BoE published an update to its 2014 approach to the resolution framework for failing banks, building societies, and certain investment firms. It also covers arrangements for central counterparties or CCPs. This new publication explains the key features of the UK resolution regime—including BoE’s statutory responsibilities and powers, along with how BoE would be likely to implement a resolution.
Part 1 of the approach to resolution explains the key features of the resolution regime. Part 2 looks at how BoE would be likely to implement a resolution, while Part 3 explains BoE's business as usual responsibilities as the UK's resolution authority. The approach highlights that the resolution reduces the bank failure risks to depositors, the financial system, and public finances. By ensuring losses will fall on a failed bank’s investors, resolution can reduce the risk of bank failures and limit their impact, when they do occur. To be effective, a resolution authority needs powers that can be applied without risk to financial stability and to the broader economy. BoE, as resolution authority, operates within a statutory framework that gives it legal powers to resolve banks to meet certain objectives.
The report further notes that the statutory regime provides BoE with powers that may be used to resolve banks. To achieve the public objectives of resolution, BoE has powers that affect the contractual rights of counterparties and investors in the failed firm; therefore, the regime provides statutory safeguards for creditors and counterparties. Shareholders and creditors must absorb losses before public funds can be used. BoE prepares for resolution by planning for the failure of every firm and coordinating with international counterparts. To make sure a firm is resolvable, BoE undertakes an assessment to identify barriers to resolution. If BoE finds barriers to "resolvability," it has powers to direct a firm to remove these through changes to their operations or structure. The resolution regime covers firms incorporated in the UK, including subsidiaries of foreign firms. The EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, or BRRD, extends this scope to branches of firms from outside the European economic area.
Related Link: Approach to Resolution (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Approach to Resolution, Resolution Framework, Resolution Planning, BoE
Previous ArticlePRA Published Consultation Paper on Recovery Planning
Next ArticleEIOPA Publishes Its Sixth Consumer Trends Report
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.