The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability. The report considers the potential benefits and challenges of new access models developed by central counterparties and discusses good practices to facilitate porting of client positions. The report also seeks to identify potential issues for follow-up work, with the comment period ending on January 24, 2022.
The client clearing process facilitates access to central counterparties, particularly for firms (known as '"clients") that are not direct participants in a central counterparty and must rely on intermediaries to indirectly clear their trades. Since some entities cannot, or choose not to, directly participate in a central counterparty, improving access to client clearing is critical to the success of the G20 objective to have all standardized over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts cleared through central counterparties. This consultative report briefly explains the objectives of the work in this area and describes “direct” and “sponsored” access models that allow entities that have historically participated indirectly as clients to directly access central counterparty services. These new models introduce new challenges, incentives, and risk distribution among different kind of participants. They also introduce new risks (for example, the risks related to the “sponsor” default), with the availability and use of these types of models varying significantly in different segments of cleared markets. These models, for instance, are not used widely for the derivatives markets. The report outlines potentially effective porting practices, focusing in particular on alternative client clearing service provider arrangements and game plans. The implications of legal frameworks and account structures, which vary in availability by jurisdiction, have been also considered in the report.
At present, if a central counterparty member defaults, its clients' accounts need to be transferred to another central counterparty member or liquidated in a short time frame. Since forced liquidation is undesirable, the report identifies effective ways to support successful porting in this event. The report proposes possible effective practices concerning three key elements of a successful central counterparty porting framework: communication, coordination, and harmonization. It sets forth issues for central counterparties to consider when developing a porting protocol and identifies a series of suggested next steps for the industry with regard to porting practices. Finally, the report sets forth a series of questions for feedback.
Comment Due Date: January 24, 2022
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, CCP, Client Clearing, Derivatives, Porting Practices, Default Risk, Credit Risk, CPMI, IOSCO
Previous ArticleAPRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular, along with the reporting form and instructions, for self-assessment, by authorized institutions, of compliance with the Code of Banking Practice 2021.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) decided to register European DataWarehouse Ltd and SecRep Limited as securitization repositories under the UK Securitization Regulation, with effect from January 17, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) published a circular with instructions on emergency liquidity assistance to banks that are unable to meet their liquidity requirements.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.