BoE announced the results of its 2017 stress test of the banking system in the UK. For the first time since this stress test was launched in 2014, no bank needs to strengthen its capital position as a result of the stress test
The 2017 stress test shows the UK banking system is resilient to deep simultaneous recessions in the UK and global economies, large falls in asset prices, and a separate stress of misconduct costs. The economic scenario in the test is more severe than the global financial crisis. Significant improvements in asset quality since the crisis mean that the loss rate on banks’ loans in the stress test is the same as in the financial crisis. In the test, banks incur losses of nearly GBP 50 billion in the first two years of the stress. This scale of loss, relative to their assets, would have wiped out the common equity capital base of the UK banking system ten years ago. This stress test shows these losses can now be absorbed within the buffers of capital that banks have on top of their minimum requirements.
Overall, capital positions have strengthened considerably in the past decade. Banks started the test with, in aggregate, a tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.4% and a tier 1 risk‑weighted capital ratio of 16.4%. The aggregate common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio was 13.4%—three times stronger than a decade ago. Even after the severe losses in the test scenario, the participating banks would, in aggregate, have a tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.3%, a CET1 capital ratio of 8.3% and a tier 1 capital ratio of 10.3%. They would, therefore, be able to continue to supply the credit the real economy could demand even in a very severe stress.
Related Link: Results of the 2017 Stress Test (PDF)
Previous ArticleIMF Publishes FSSA and Article IV Consultation Reports on Japan
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.