BoE announced the results of its 2017 stress test of the banking system in the UK. For the first time since this stress test was launched in 2014, no bank needs to strengthen its capital position as a result of the stress test
The 2017 stress test shows the UK banking system is resilient to deep simultaneous recessions in the UK and global economies, large falls in asset prices, and a separate stress of misconduct costs. The economic scenario in the test is more severe than the global financial crisis. Significant improvements in asset quality since the crisis mean that the loss rate on banks’ loans in the stress test is the same as in the financial crisis. In the test, banks incur losses of nearly GBP 50 billion in the first two years of the stress. This scale of loss, relative to their assets, would have wiped out the common equity capital base of the UK banking system ten years ago. This stress test shows these losses can now be absorbed within the buffers of capital that banks have on top of their minimum requirements.
Overall, capital positions have strengthened considerably in the past decade. Banks started the test with, in aggregate, a tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.4% and a tier 1 risk‑weighted capital ratio of 16.4%. The aggregate common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio was 13.4%—three times stronger than a decade ago. Even after the severe losses in the test scenario, the participating banks would, in aggregate, have a tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.3%, a CET1 capital ratio of 8.3% and a tier 1 capital ratio of 10.3%. They would, therefore, be able to continue to supply the credit the real economy could demand even in a very severe stress.
Related Link: Results of the 2017 Stress Test (PDF)
Previous ArticleIMF Publishes FSSA and Article IV Consultation Reports on Japan
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
EIOPA published its risk dashboard based on Solvency II data from the fourth quarter of 2019.
MNB published a statement on loan payments post the announced moratorium, in addition to a set of new questions and answers (Q&A) on supervisory measures and requirements announced amid COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool for banks.
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published an interim final rule that temporarily revises the supplementary leverage ratio calculation for depository institutions.