APRA Proposes to Align Capital and Reporting Frameworks with AASB 17
APRA published a discussion paper that outlines plans to align the capital and reporting frameworks for life, general, and private health insurance with AASB 17 on insurance contracts, where appropriate. AASB 17 implements the equivalent IFRS 17 in Australia. APRA is also updating the Life and General Insurance Capital (LAGIC) framework, given it has not been substantively reviewed since it was implemented in 2013. The consultation on the discussion paper will close on March 31, 2021. APRA intends to publish a Response to Submissions paper and draft standards in the fourth quarter of 2021, with the final standards to be released in 2022. The final APRA capital and reporting standards will then become effective from July 01, 2023.
AASB 17 establishes principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of insurance contracts. The introduction of AASB 17 will both modify a number of accounting concepts that underpin the prudential framework of APRA and introduce some new concepts. The aim is to consult on and finalize changes to the capital and reporting frameworks of APRA in advance of the 2023 AASB 17 commencement date, to ensure that the regulatory burden is minimized. The proposals in this discussion paper are intended to maintain the resilience of the capital and reporting frameworks and the financial stability of the industry going forward. These proposals are timely, as stakeholder feedback from insurers has consistently indicated a strong desire for early direction from APRA on how the capital and reporting frameworks are likely to change as a result of AASB 17. The key proposals include the following
- For reporting, APRA proposes to align the reporting framework with AASB 17. Insurers will be able to use the AASB 17 accounting policies and principles to report financial performance and insurance asset and liability items to APRA. However, for life insurance, there are a number of areas where APRA proposes to prescribe reporting directions, given the requirements set out in the Life Insurance Act 1995 (Life Act).
- APRA proposes to enhance the granularity of product reporting and liability reporting groups. These enhancements are intended to address concerns that existing APRA product reporting does not provide detailed insights on the profitability of products and their long term financial sustainability. Further granularity in product reporting would assist APRA, insurers, and other stakeholder to better monitor sustainability and performance of certain products over time.
- APRA proposes to introduce new product groups across general insurance and life insurance and outline reporting directions across insurance sector to help insurers to better prepare for AASB 17 implementation for reporting.
- For the general and life insurance capital framework, APRA proposes to retain the majority of the existing requirements for the regulatory capital calculation. The majority of the capital proposals outlined in this paper relate to clarifications of the regulatory capital calculation, given the introduction of AASB 17.
- With respect to regulatory adjustments, APRA proposes no change in the overall approach to the application of the liability regulatory adjustment; however, additional regulatory adjustments are proposed to minimize impact from AASB 17 changes.
The implementation of AASB 17 is expected to result in amendments to multiple prudential standards. Therefore, APRA is taking this opportunity to address the areas identified for update across the LAGIC framework, to ensure that the framework remains fit-for-purpose. The majority of proposed revisions do not seek to fundamentally change the operation of the prudential framework, nor do they seek to generally increase or reduce capital levels. APRA is also reviewing the capital framework for private health insurers. To avoid duplicative effort and cost for insurers, APRA intends to align the commencement of the private health insurer capital framework with the implementation of AASB 17 for prudential purposes from July 01, 2023. APRA proposes that all insurers, regardless of their financial year-end, commence reporting to APRA (for quarterly, interim, and annual reports) and determining regulatory capital requirements on an AASB 17 basis from July 01, 2023.
Additionally, APRA has decided to conduct a targeted Quantitative Impact Study (QIS) in 2020 alongside this discussion paper. Insurers selected to participate in the targeted QIS have been individually notified by APRA and only targeted insurers will be required to complete the workbooks published alongside the discussion paper. To assess industry progress, APRA intends to conduct a further implementation survey in the second quarter of 2021 and engage with individual insurers that have not adequately progressed with their implementation.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: March 31, 2021
Effective Date: July 01, 2023
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Insurance, IFRS 17, AASB 17, Insurance Contracts, Reporting, LAGIC Framework, QIS, APRA
Featured Experts
Gavin Conn
Experienced life actuary; background in economic capital modeling; ALM specialist; IFRS 17 researcher
David Fihrer
Skilled life insurance actuary; subject matter expert on IFRS 17 and source of earnings
Cassandra Hannibal
Life insurance actuary; risk management and economic capital specialist
Previous Article
PRA Policy on Stressed VaR and RNIV Calculations Under Market RiskRelated Articles
BIS Examines Use of Big Data and Machine Learning at Central Banks
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA Finalizes Reporting Standard for Operational Risk Requirements
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB Publishes Guide for Determining Penalties for Regulatory Breaches
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS Sets Out Good Practices to Manage Operational Risks Amid COVID
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR Announces New Data Collection Application for Banks and Insurers
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB Maintains CCyB at 0%, Initiates First Cycle of Regulatory Sandbox
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA Launches Study on Non-Life Underwriting Risk in Internal Models
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB Publishes Overview of Resolution Tools Available in Banking Union
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA Consults on Pillar 3 Disclosure Standards for ESG Risks Under CRR
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
