Stacey Schreft, the Deputy Director for Research and Analysis at the OFR, updated the FSOC on the bilateral repo collection initiative of OFR at the meeting of the principals of the FSOC. In collaboration with the New York FED and the Federal Reserve System, OFR updated the FSOC on plans for a permanent repo data collection.
Stacey Schreft highlighted, “We intend to collect data in two stages. The first will focus on cleared repo transactions. In the second, we will collect data on unclear bilateral repo transactions. We intend to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on a cleared repo collection in the first half of 2018.” According to Stacey, these collections are critical for three reasons:
- They will fill a major data gap in securities financing transactions. From the data pilot, it is estimated that bilateral repo activity constitutes about half of the repo funding of major dealers and the majority of the funding that dealers provide to others. Monitoring the tenor, haircuts, and rates in such repos across a broad range of collateral will help us understand the functioning of, and spot stress in, asset and funding markets.
- The interest rate information that is collected on cleared repo transactions is critical for the production of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) selected by the Alternative Reference Rate Committee, as an alternative to London Interbank Offered Rate or LIBOR. The cleared repo data will be used immediately in the publication of the SOFR. Subsequently collecting data on unclear bilateral repo transactions will ensure the availability of comprehensive data for rate production as markets evolve.
- By shedding light more broadly on the specifics of repo funding, these collections will support other FSOC initiatives such as understanding dynamics that affect liquidity in Treasury markets.
Related Links: Update on Bilateral Repo Collection
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Bilateral Repo Collection, Repo Transactions, FSOC, OFR
Previous ArticleIMF Reports on the 2017 Article IV Consultation with Norway
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.