ESMA published a final report on the Money Market Funds Regulation (MMFR). The final report contains final versions of the technical advice, implementing technical standards, and guidelines on stress test scenarios carried out by money market fund (MMF) managers under the MMFR.
The key requirements relate to asset liquidity and credit quality, the establishment of a reporting template, and stress test scenarios carried out by MMF managers. The key requirements under the different policy tools are as follows:
- Technical Advice covers the liquidity and credit quality requirements applicable to assets received as part of a reverse repurchase agreement. It also covers the criteria for validation of the credit quality assessment methodologies and the criteria for quantification of the credit risk and the relative risk of default of an issuer and of the instrument in which the MMF invests, along with the criteria to establish qualitative indicators on the issuer of the instrument
- Implementing Technical Standards address the development of a reporting template containing all the information managers of MMFs are required to send to the competent authority of the MMF, including on the characteristics, portfolio indicators, assets, and liabilities of the MMF. This information will be submitted to the national competent authorities and then transmitted to ESMA. These standards shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
- Guidelines address common reference parameters of the scenarios to be included in the stress tests that managers of MMFs are required to conduct. This takes into account such factors as hypothetical changes in the level of liquidity of the assets held in the portfolio of the MMF, movements of interest rates, and exchange rates or levels of redemption. Guidelines on stress tests scenarios under Article 28 of the MMF Regulation apply from the dates specified in articles 44 and 47 of the MMFR.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, MMFR, MMF, Stress Testing, ESMA
Previous ArticleBOM Updates Guidelines and Guidance Notes in July 2017
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.