General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
November 09, 2017

European Parliament published a study on a new regime on sovereign concentration charges for banks’ sovereign exposures. The paper makes a concrete proposal for a Sovereign Concentration Charges Regulation (SCCR), including calibration and careful transitional arrangements to avoid any disorderly market impact.

Achieving the aim of Europe’s banking union project, to break the vicious circle between banks and sovereigns, requires new policy initiatives. The most direct bank-sovereign linkages are national deposit insurance and concentrated domestic sovereign exposures. Thus, simultaneously, with a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) as proposed by the EC in 2015, the EU should introduce regulatory disincentives against highly concentrated sovereign exposures of euro area banks. The SCCR and EDIS together could realistically receive political approval in 2018 and be fully implemented within a decade. This paper outlines a workable design for the SCCR as the new EU legislation to be adopted as a complement of EDIS. The SCCR would add sovereign exposures above a certain threshold (defined as a ratio to tier 1 capital), weighted by a coefficient (sovereign concentration charge) that increases with the exposure ratio, to risk-weighted assets in the capital ratio’s denominator. The charges for concentrated sovereign exposures to different euro-area countries would add up. Sovereign exposures under 33% of tier 1 capital would be entirely exempt. The marginal capital charges on concentrated exposures would be mild for exposures of up to 100% of tier 1 capital and will rise more steeply above that level. Should this calibration turn out to have an insufficient impact, it could be strengthened at a later stage. 

The proposed transitional arrangements are also designed to ensure a smooth path toward the new regime, even if market conditions become less favorable. The transitional arrangements include extensive consultation with market participants, a gradual phase-in over a long period, and exemption from the concentration charges of all debt issued before the SCCR’s entry into force. While banks’ behavioral response to the new regime is impossible to predict with certainty, it is expected that most banks will respond to the introduction of the SCCR by diversifying their sovereign exposures away from their current home bias, but leaving them largely unchanged in euro-area aggregate. If so, the reform will neither materially impact banks’ prudential ratios nor entail any material costs. The adoption of the proposed SCCR, along with a full EDIS—ideally complemented by other reforms to increase risk-sharing and enhance market discipline in the banking policy framework—would significantly reduce bank-sovereign linkages and thus strengthen the Banking Union, foster greater EU financial integration, and increase financial stability for each member state and for the EU as a whole.

 

Related Link: Study on Sovereign Concentration Charges (PDF)

Keywords: Europe, Banking, SCCR, EDIS, Sovereign Exposures, Pillar 1, Study, European Parliament

Related Insights
News

US Agencies Propose Revisions to FFIEC Reports 031, 041, 051, and 101

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) propose to extend for three years, with revision, FFIEC 031, FFIEC 041, FFIEC 051, and FFIEC 101.

February 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OFR Adopts Data Collection Rule on Centrally Cleared Repo Transactions

OFR adopted a final rule to establish a data collection covering centrally cleared funding transactions in the U.S. repurchase agreement (repo) market.

February 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FHFA Finalizes Rule on Federal Home Loan Bank Capital Requirements

FHFA published, in Federal Register, the final rule to adopt, as its own, portions of the regulations of the Federal Housing Finance Board pertaining to the capital requirements for the Federal Home Loan Banks.

February 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Publishes PS4/19 on Loss-Absorbency Mechanism Under Solvency II

PRA published a policy statement (PS4/19) that provides feedback on responses to the consultation paper (CP27/18) on adjusting for the reduction of loss absorbency where own fund instruments are taxed on write down under Solvency II.

February 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SRB Publishes Framework for Performing Valuations in Resolution

The framework provides independent valuers and the general public with an indication of the expectations of SRB on the principles and methodologies for valuation reports, as set out in the legal framework.

February 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BIS Paper on Effect of Securities Lending on OTC Market Liquidity

BIS published a working paper that studies how securities lending affects over-the-counter market (OTC) liquidity.

February 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Extend Consultation Period for the Proposed SA-CCR

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) extended the comment period for a proposed rule to update their standards for how firms measure counterparty credit risk posed by derivative contracts.

February 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Extends Consultation Period for Stress Testing Rule

FED has published in the Federal Register a notice proposing amendments to the company run and supervisory stress test rules.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for February 2019

EBA published answers to two questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SEC Proposes Rule on Risk Mitigation Techniques for Uncleared SBS

SEC proposed a rule that would require the application of specific risk-mitigation techniques to portfolios of security-based swaps (SBS) that are not submitted for clearing.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2623