GLEIF updated the list of current and proposed regulatory activities, including the use of the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI). The updates concern certain approved regulatory policies of RBI and the People's Bank of China (PBC).
RBI requires corporate borrowers with aggregate fund-based and non-fund based exposure of INR 50 million and above to obtain an LEI and capture it in the Central Repository of Information on Large Credits (CRILC). PBC stipulates that institutional pledgers or pledgees of the registration system of pledges receivables should provide identifiers such as business registration number, uniform social credit code, and LEI.
It is the prerogative of the authorities acting in individual jurisdictions to mandate the use of LEIs. In many jurisdictions around the globe, public authorities rely on the LEI to evaluate risk, take corrective steps and, if required, minimize market abuse and improve the accuracy of financial data. It is the prerogative of the authorities acting in individual jurisdictions to mandate the use of LEIs. GLEIF closely monitors initiatives relevant to legal entity identification in regulatory reporting and supervision and updates this list regularly.
Related Link: Regulatory Use of LEI
Keywords: International, Asia Pacific, India, China, Banking, Securities, Regulation and Supervision, Pledged Receivables, CRILC, LEI, GLEIF
Previous ArticleESMA Finds Shortcomings in National Supervision of EPM by UCITS
Next ArticleFSB Publishes Toolkit to Mitigate Misconduct Risk
HKMA urged authorized institutions to take early action to adhere to the IBOR Fallbacks Protocol, which ISDA is expected to publish soon.
FSB published a global transition roadmap for London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
HM Treasury published a document that summarizes the responses received from a consultation on the approach of UK to transposition of the revised Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD2).
HM Treasury published the government response to the feedback received on the consultation for updating the prudential regime of UK before the end of the Brexit transition period.
PRA published the final policy statement PS22/20, which contains the updated supervisory statement SS12/13 on counterparty credit risk.
FSB published an update on its work to address market fragmentation. FSB is working in this area in collaboration with the other standard-setting bodies.
EBA proposed revisions to the guidelines on major incident reporting under the second Payment Service Directive (PSD2).
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the methodology for prudential treatment of software assets by banks.
FSB published a report presenting the roadmap to enhance cross-border payments by providing a high-level plan that sets ambitious but achievable goals and milestones in the five focus areas.
In a recent communication, EIOPA urged the insurance sector to complete its preparations for the end of the Brexit transition period on December 31, 2020.