Featured Product

    FSB Consults on Recommendations for Compensation Data Reporting

    May 07, 2018

    FSB launched a consultation on the recommendations for consistent national reporting of data on the use of compensation tools to address misconduct risk. FSB also published a summary note of an industry workshop that was organized last December as part of the FSB work to develop these recommendations. Feedback is invited by July 06, 2018. FSB also welcomes feedback on topics discussed at the workshop that are included in the summary note.

    The recommendations are a part of the FSB’s 2015 workplan on measures to reduce misconduct risk. The proposed data set included in the recommendations is designed to help firms and supervisors answer a number of important questions, including whether governance and risk management processes surrounding compensation:

    • Appropriately include conduct considerations in the design of their compensation and incentive systems, including the setting of individual goals, ex ante performance measurement mechanisms and ex post compensation adjustments

    • Support the effective use of compensation tools to help promote good conduct or to remediate individual conduct that is not in line with the firm’s expectations, including holding individuals accountable for any misconduct that occurs

    • Promote wider risk management goals, including for conduct issues, consistent with the firm’s strategy and risk tolerance

    • Support the effective identification of emerging misconduct risks and, where appropriate, review use of incentive systems and compensation decisions in response to conduct incidents to ensure alignment of incentives, risk, and reward

    The recommendations must be viewed in light of the existing national laws and in a manner consistent with the supervisory powers individual regulators have been granted. Decisions on the scope of data gathering, the types of data, and the appropriate data gathering cycle and frequency are solely for national supervisory authorities to make; such decisions should consider the types of supervisory work conducted, the relevant legislative and regulatory framework, the extent to which data is already collected, whether the firm is a significant financial institution, and the specific risk profile or financial activities of the firm.


    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: July 06, 2018

    Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Misconduct Risk, Compensation Reporting, Recommendations, FSB

    Related Articles
    News

    EIOPA Report Analyzes Use and Impact of Long-Term Guarantee Measures

    EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.

    December 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS, SNB, and SIX Announce Successful Completion of CBDC POC

    The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.

    December 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Sets Out Treatment of Certain Banking Book Positions Under FRTB

    EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.

    December 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Consults on Integrating Climate Change into SII Standard Formula

    EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.

    December 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Issues Corrigenda to Investment Firms Directive and Regulation

    EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.

    December 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Proposes Changes to Rules Arising from Banking Amendment Act

    MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.

    December 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA to Elaborate on Approach to Transposition of CRD5 by Mid-December

    PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.

    November 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    RBNZ Consults on Aspects of Insurance Act, Solvency Standards & IFRS17

    RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.

    November 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB Sets Out Work Program for 2021-2023

    SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.

    November 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Consults on KPIs on Sustainability for Non-Financial Reporting

    EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.

    November 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6191