ESMA issued a comment letter to EC, welcoming its proposal to update the non-binding guidelines on non-financial reporting with the introduction of a specific supplement addressing climate-related disclosures. ESMA made some recommendations on how the guidelines can be further developed to promote higher quality disclosures.
On February 20, 2019, EC consulted on update of the non-binding guidelines on non-financial reporting. ESMA recommends the EC to ensure that when reviewing the guidelines, an appropriate balance is achieved across requirements relating to the various non-financial matters, with the aim to avoid the issue that focus on a specific matter, such as climate change, detracts from attention to the necessary disclosures on the other non-financial matters. While generally supporting the proposals in the consultation document, ESMA would like to highlight the following key areas where the proposed approach to update the guidelines could be further improved:
- While ESMA welcomes the EC clarification on how the notion of materiality in the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), as transposed into local law, should apply to climate-related disclosures, it believes that the clarifications included in the consultation would also be beneficial for the main text of the guidelines. Therefore, ESMA encourages EC to incorporate these clarifications into the existing section of the guidelines relating to material information.
- The consultation document proposes to structure the climate-related requirements into "Type 1" and "Type 2" disclosures, wherein Type 1 disclosures would represent more basic or minimum disclosures that issuers are expected to provide in all cases in which climate-related matters are material, while Type 2 disclosures would only be intended to provide more enhanced information. ESMA recommends expanding the disclosures that are currently proposed as Type 1 with some of the requirements that are currently only classified as Type 2 (detailed suggestions in this regard are proposed in the Annex to the comment letter). In addition, ESMA suggests considering the applicability of the proposed structure to the other disclosure requirements in the guidelines.
- ESMA, building on the enforcement experience of non-financial statements, highlights additional areas for improvement related to the NFRD. In its view, without an increase in the specificity of the requirements in the NFRD, any amendment to the guidelines, even if helpful, is unlikely to result in a significant shift toward more consistent and enforceable non-financial reporting.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Non-Financial Reporting, Climate-Related Disclosures, Non-Binding Guidelines, EC, ESMA
Previous ArticleDNB Publishes Banking and Insurance Newsletters for March 2019
Next ArticleBoE Extends Notification Period for TPR Under Brexit
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.