The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that offers a general understanding of decentralized finance, including the areas of potential regulatory concern.
The report aims to provide a general understanding of decentralized finance as well as its features and protocols, including the key areas of potential regulatory concern. It notes that decentralized finance is quickly evolving to mirror conventional financial markets and highlights the need to understand the regulatory implications that arise from decentralized finance. The report notes that lending and borrowing protocols are two of the primary decentralized finance products currently available. The report also notes that understanding the regulatory implications arising from decentralized finance requires analyzing the totality of a decentralized finance ecosystem as it exists currently, its interrelationship with centralized crypto-asset trading platforms and service providers and traditional markets and activities, and how it may continue to develop in the future. Developing a comprehensive understanding includes
- identifying and analyzing, among other things, the structural components of each type of decentralized finance financial product, service, arrangement, and activity
- what aspects of these may be “decentralized” and why
- what are the roles of each of the components and participants involved at each of the different layers or levels, including their incentives and motivations
- how participants engage with the various components and each other
- the roles that centralized crypto-asset trading platforms and service providers play
Many of the financial products, services, arrangements, and activities in decentralized finance mirror, and in some cases overlap with, more traditional securities and derivatives products, services, arrangements, and activities. In some cases, these may be novel to decentralized finance. One primary characteristic of decentralized finance is its peer-to-peer nature and the resulting ability to create alternatives to traditional and centralized financial market infrastructures, products or services, and potentially complicate the application of existing regulatory frameworks to decentralized finance market participants and activities, including those that govern issuers, offerings, products, intermediaries, and trading markets. The report notes that blockchain decentralized finance services are often similar to traditional finance services but, with weaker regulation and increased risks for investors. As decentralized finance continues to expand, both a granular and holistic understanding of the decentralized finance market will improve authorities’ ability to understand the regulatory implications of this emergent market with respect to their own jurisdictions. The report acknowledges that decentralized finance is a continuously evolving area and IOSCO will continue to examine this area and its implications for market regulators. In response to the report, IOSCO has announced the establishment of a new task force that will provide timely and coordinated policy action to address the risks arising from this fast-growing area. IOSCO has also called for comment and input from the public, including crypto-asset market and decentralized finance participants and from any other interested party, on the issues raised in this report as well as on any other matter related to crypto-assets or decentralized finance.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Decentralized Finance, Crypto-Assets, Crypto-Asset Platforms, Lending, Regtech, DeFi, Blockchain, P2P Lending, IOSCO
Previous ArticleEU Issues Rules on CRR, Makes Headway on CCD, CSRD, NIS2, and DORA
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.
The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.
The General Board of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), at its December meeting, issued an updated risk assessment via the quarterly risk dashboard and held discussions on key policy priorities to address the systemic risks in the European Union.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking comments, until December 21, 2022, on the draft guidance for firms to support existing mortgage borrowers.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that assesses progress on the transition from the Interbank Offered Rates, or IBORs, to overnight risk-free rates as well as a report that assesses global trends in the non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) sector.