HKMA announced updates to the Supervisory Policy Manual (SPM) module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. The SPM module CR-G-14 outlines the HKMA approach for determining the comparability of a jurisdiction’s margin and risk mitigation standards with the provisions set out in the module. The updates relate to the comparability of the UK standards after Brexit and to the recent statement published by BCBS and IOSCO on the final implementation phases of the margin requirements.
Comparability of the UK standards after Brexit
Under the substituted compliance treatment in the module, the margin and risk mitigation standards of the Working Group on Margin Requirements (WGMR) member jurisdictions are deemed to be comparable from the day the respective standards have entered into force in those jurisdictions. Footnote 24 of SPM module CR-G-14 lists the jurisdictions deemed comparable by referring to EU and all non-EU WGMR member jurisdictions. This wording would currently not cover the UK after its planned withdrawal from EU. It is, however, the intention of HKMA to maintain UK’s status as a deemed-comparable jurisdiction in the context of SPM module CR-G-14, independent of its EU membership status. Footnote 24 would, therefore, be revised to specifically cover UK once it withdraws from EU.
Clarifications on the final implementation phases for margin requirements
BCBS and IOSCO issued a joint statement on March 05, 2019, providing two clarifications with respect to the their framework for margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. Regarding the remaining phases of implementation of the framework in 2019 and 2020, initial margin requirements will apply to a large number of entities for the first time, potentially involving documentation and custodial and operational arrangements. BCBS and IOSCO clarify that the framework does not specify documentation, custodial, or operational requirements if the bilateral initial margin amount does not exceed the framework's EUR 50 million initial margin threshold.
The above clarifications provided by BCBS and IOSCO are applicable in the context of SPM module CR-G-14. Genuine amendments to the existing derivatives contracts that are made to give effect to interest rate benchmark reforms will not be considered new contracts from the perspective of the HKMA margin requirements. In addition, SPM module CR-G-14 does not specify a requirement for initial margin documentation and custodial or other related operational arrangements that must be in place before a covered entity crosses the HKD 375 million initial margin threshold. Covered entities should, however, take necessary steps to prepare the documentation and other related arrangements well enough in advance to be in a position to exchange initial margin when the threshold is exceeded and to protect exchanged initial margin with proper custodial arrangements. HKMA, in coordination with other BCBS and IOSCO members, will continue to monitor the effect of meeting the final stage of phase-in of the margin requirements.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Europe, EU, UK, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, SPM Module CR-G-14, Brexit, Margin Requirements, Interest Rate Risk, OTC Derivatives, HKMA
Previous ArticleECB Report Examines Window-Dressing Behavior in G-SIB Framework
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report that examines the use of certain exemptions included in the large exposures regime under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Bank of England (BoE) issued a communication to firms to provide an update on the progress of the joint data transformation program—which is being led by BoE, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and the industry—for the financial sector in UK.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the draft methodology, templates, and template guidance for the European Union-wide stress test in 2023.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) jointly published the final guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) for investment firms.
The Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) proposed expectations, via CP8/22, in respect of changes to the instruments or claims that comprise unvested deferred sums awarded to material risk-takers as part of their variable pay.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.7.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) updated the 2023 Basel Capital Adequacy Reporting (BCAR) manual as well as the 2023 BCAR return.
In a letter to the G20 Leaders, ahead of the July 2022 meeting, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Chair set out an overview of the key work done by FSB.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published its resolvability assessment and "heat map" for 2021, updated the operational guidance on implementation of bail-in tool, and issued the annual report for 2021.