HKMA announced updates to the Supervisory Policy Manual (SPM) module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. The SPM module CR-G-14 outlines the HKMA approach for determining the comparability of a jurisdiction’s margin and risk mitigation standards with the provisions set out in the module. The updates relate to the comparability of the UK standards after Brexit and to the recent statement published by BCBS and IOSCO on the final implementation phases of the margin requirements.
Comparability of the UK standards after Brexit
Under the substituted compliance treatment in the module, the margin and risk mitigation standards of the Working Group on Margin Requirements (WGMR) member jurisdictions are deemed to be comparable from the day the respective standards have entered into force in those jurisdictions. Footnote 24 of SPM module CR-G-14 lists the jurisdictions deemed comparable by referring to EU and all non-EU WGMR member jurisdictions. This wording would currently not cover the UK after its planned withdrawal from EU. It is, however, the intention of HKMA to maintain UK’s status as a deemed-comparable jurisdiction in the context of SPM module CR-G-14, independent of its EU membership status. Footnote 24 would, therefore, be revised to specifically cover UK once it withdraws from EU.
Clarifications on the final implementation phases for margin requirements
BCBS and IOSCO issued a joint statement on March 05, 2019, providing two clarifications with respect to the their framework for margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. Regarding the remaining phases of implementation of the framework in 2019 and 2020, initial margin requirements will apply to a large number of entities for the first time, potentially involving documentation and custodial and operational arrangements. BCBS and IOSCO clarify that the framework does not specify documentation, custodial, or operational requirements if the bilateral initial margin amount does not exceed the framework's EUR 50 million initial margin threshold.
The above clarifications provided by BCBS and IOSCO are applicable in the context of SPM module CR-G-14. Genuine amendments to the existing derivatives contracts that are made to give effect to interest rate benchmark reforms will not be considered new contracts from the perspective of the HKMA margin requirements. In addition, SPM module CR-G-14 does not specify a requirement for initial margin documentation and custodial or other related operational arrangements that must be in place before a covered entity crosses the HKD 375 million initial margin threshold. Covered entities should, however, take necessary steps to prepare the documentation and other related arrangements well enough in advance to be in a position to exchange initial margin when the threshold is exceeded and to protect exchanged initial margin with proper custodial arrangements. HKMA, in coordination with other BCBS and IOSCO members, will continue to monitor the effect of meeting the final stage of phase-in of the margin requirements.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Europe, EU, UK, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, SPM Module CR-G-14, Brexit, Margin Requirements, Interest Rate Risk, OTC Derivatives, HKMA
Previous ArticleECB Report Examines Window-Dressing Behavior in G-SIB Framework
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.