The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published a newsletter that outlines the potential focus areas for the supervision of artificial intelligence and machine learning models.
During the internal discussions, BCBS has identified several areas for continued analysis by supervisors. Since, artificial intelligence-machine learning models are more complex and difficult to manage, banks are seeking to maintain a level of transparency in model design, operation, and interpretability of model outcomes commensurate with the risk of the banking activity being supported. In case of artificial intelligence-machine learning model being outsourced, banks still have to maintain the responsibility and accountability for appropriate due diligence and oversight. The artificial intelligence-machine learning model deployment often involves use of large data sets, interconnectivity with third parties, and the use of cloud technologies; it creates greater data governance challenges for banks to ensure data quality, relevance, security, and confidentiality, including cyber risk. Furthermore, artificial intelligence-machine learning models (as with traditional models) can reflect biases and inaccuracies in the data they are trained on and potentially result in unethical outcomes if not properly managed.
Given the challenges associated with an artificial intelligence-machine learning model, both supervisors and banks are assessing existing risk management and governance practices to determine whether roles and responsibilities for identifying and managing risks remain sufficient. BCBS is working to develop insights on the supervisory implications of the use of artificial intelligence-machine learning models and intends to focus on:
- the extent and degree to which the outcomes of models can be understood and explained
- artificial intelligence-machine learning model governance structures, including responsibilities and accountability for decisions driven by artificial intelligence-machine learning models
- the potential implications of broader usage of artificial intelligence-machine learning models for the resilience of individual banks and, more broadly, for financial stability
Related Link: BCBS Newsletter
Keywords: International, Banking, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Fintech, Model Explainability, Cloud Service Providers, Credit Risk, Regtech, Predictive Analytics, BCBS
Previous ArticleSNB Publishes Release 5.12 of Form on Counterparty Solvency Risk
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published its latest set of long-term climate macro-financial scenarios (Phase IV) for assessing forward-looking climate risks.