ISDA proposed amendments to the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions to address issues related to the narrowly tailored credit events (NTCEs). Feedback was requested by April 10, 2019. NTCEs are arrangements with corporations that cause a credit event leading to settlement of credit default swap (CDS) contracts while minimizing the impact on the corporation. ISDA also published the views of its Chief Executive Officer Scott O'Malia on the proposed amendments.
The proposal includes the following amendments:
- Proposed Amendment to "Failure to Pay" Definition and Publication of Guidance Memo. The definition of the Failure to Pay Credit Event (Section 4.5 of the Definitions) will be amended to add a requirement that the relevant payment failure result from or in a deterioration in creditworthiness or financial condition of the Reference Entity. This requirement would apply to corporate and financial Reference Entities but would not apply to sovereign Reference Entities. To provide additional clarity to apply the new test, a guidance memo will be published. The guidance memo will set out the purpose of this requirement and a non-exhaustive list of factors that should be taken into account in making a determination under the new test. The proposed amendment to the Failure to Pay definition and text of the guidance memo has been attached as Annex 1.
- Proposed Clarification to "Outstanding Principal Balance" Definition. Section 2.10 of the Definitions requires the Outstanding Principal Balance to be determined using the “Quantum of the Claim,” which is determined in accordance with the applicable law. Section 2.10 of the Definitions will be amended to add a clarification that the “applicable law” includes any bankruptcy or insolvency law that would apply to the Reference Entity if it were to enter bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings. The proposed amendment to the Outstanding Principal Balance Definition has been attached as Annex 2.
These proposals were discussed by the ISDA working group comprising members of the ISDA Credit Steering Committee and additional ISDA members active in the CDS market. Although the working group has not yet completed its work and, therefore, may have additional proposals, these amendments represent some of the most important aspects of the proposed changes agreed by the working group to date.
Comment Due Date: April 10, 2019
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, NTCE, Credit Default Swap, Credit Derivatives Definitions, Failure to Pay, Credit Risk, ISDA
Previous ArticleSEC Requests Extension of Collection on BCS Rules for SBS Entities
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.