FDIC is amending the Securitization Safe Harbor Rule, which relates to the treatment of financial assets transferred in connection with a securitization transaction. FDIC is revising the rule by removing a disclosure requirement that was established by the Securitization Safe Harbor Rule when it was amended and restated in 2010. As amended, disclosure is required under § 360.6(b)(2)(i)(A) only in the case of an issuance of obligations that is subject to Regulation AB. The final rule will be effective from May 04, 2020.
The amendment is intended to eliminate a requirement that the securitization documents require compliance with Regulation AB of the SEC in circumstances where Regulation AB by its terms would not apply to the issuance of obligations backed by such financial assets. The policy objective of this final rule is to remove an unnecessary barrier to securitization transactions, particularly the securitization of residential mortgages, without adverse effects on the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions. The Securitization Safe Harbor Rule addresses circumstances that may arise if FDIC is appointed receiver or conservator for an insured depository institution that has sponsored one or more securitization transactions. FDIC is removing the requirement of the Securitization Safe Harbor Rule that the documents governing a securitization transaction require compliance with Regulation AB of the SEC in circumstances where Regulation AB is not applicable to the transaction under the terms of the regulation.
Regulation AB imposes significant asset-level disclosure requirements in connection with registered securitization issuances. While SEC has not applied the Regulation AB disclosure requirements to private placement transactions, the Securitization Safe Harbor Rule has required (except for certain grandfathered transactions) that these disclosures be required as a condition for eligibility for benefits of the Securitization Safe Harbor Rule. The net effect appears to have been a disincentive for insured depository institutions to sponsor securitizations of residential mortgages that are compliant with the rule.
FDIC had proposed these amendments on August 22, 2019, with the comment period of the proposed rule ending on October 21, 2019. FDIC received ten comment letters—five from trade organizations, one from an insured depository institution, two from individuals, one from a financial reform advocacy group, and one from a financial market public interest group. FDIC considered all of the comments it received when developing the final rule. The final rule, however, remains unchanged from the proposed rule.
Related Link: Final Rule
Effective Date: May 04, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Securitization, Disclosures, Securitization Safe Harbor Rule, Regulation AB, SEC, FDIC
Previous ArticleSBV Consults on Rules on Safety of Information Systems in Banks
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.