During the keynote speech at the farewell seminar of Jan Sijbrand in Amsterdam, Danièle Nouy, Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, spoke about the ECB Banking Supervision’s approach to supervising governance. She outlined the contributions of DNB in this area and highlighted that ECB Banking Supervision has built a holistic and comprehensive approach to assessing governance. She described what banks have achieved so far in this area, what banks still need to improve, and where supervisors can still improve.
While discussing the ECB approach to supervising bank governance, she outlined the tools being used by ECB. The tools included the fit and proper assessments; Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process or SREP, including risk appetite frameworks; the "deep-dive" tool; on-site inspections; and benchmarking banks from across the euro area. "All the tools I just mentioned have proven to be quite useful and we can already see that banks have significantly improved their governance and risk management," said Ms. Nouy. Banks have started to follow the recommendations on fit and proper assessments and self-assessment has become a common practice for bank boards. Banks are striving to enhance the structure and organization of their boards in line with the highest international standards. Some banks have split risk and audit committees while others have set up clear reporting lines to the risk and audit committees for certain functions. Additionally, banks have made progress in designing their risk appetite frameworks (RAFs). They have clarified the roles of the different stakeholders and internal audit functions have become increasingly involved in the independent review of their RAFs.
Next, she discussed the ways in which banks can implement further improvements in the area of governance. The size of banks’ boards should not impede their decision-making, especially in crisis situations that require quick decisions. The collective knowledge of boards can still be improved. Banks also need to maintain an adequate level of control. Under no circumstances should banks cut costs at the expense of risk management and of the quality of risk data aggregation and reporting. It is also important that banks’ budgetary processes are aligned with their risk appetite frameworks. RAFs should be further enhanced, particularly for non-financial risks such as compliance, reputational, IT, legal, and conduct risks. Moreover, banks should work toward a balance between risk and reward and remuneration schemes should be better aligned with RAFs. Finally, data quality should be improved, especially for data underlying the risk reports presented to banks’ boards or data used in designing the IT architecture. IT and management information systems are crucial for the ability of banks’ boards to easily obtain key information on the bank’s risk capacity, risk appetite, risk limits and risk profile across business lines and subsidiaries.
Ms. Nouy highlighted that supervisors and regulators can further improve their toolkit. "Fit and proper rules are a case in point. They are an “old” part of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV, drafted under “minimal harmonization principles” and would benefit significantly from further harmonization." Policymakers should address three main issues to achieve this goal. First, all fit and proper assessments should be carried out before the candidate is appointed and takes up the new function. Second, a single methodology is needed to determine whether members of the management body are truly independent and have no conflicts of interest. At present, national law and supervisory practices on independence differ across the euro area, resulting in an uneven playing field for banks. Third, there needs to be full clarity on the definition of “key function holders.” Overall, she highlighted the importance of governance and emphasized that good governance is "a timeless asset for every bank."
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Supervision, Governance, CRD IV, Risk Appetite, ECB
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.