During the keynote speech at the farewell seminar of Jan Sijbrand in Amsterdam, Danièle Nouy, Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, spoke about the ECB Banking Supervision’s approach to supervising governance. She outlined the contributions of DNB in this area and highlighted that ECB Banking Supervision has built a holistic and comprehensive approach to assessing governance. She described what banks have achieved so far in this area, what banks still need to improve, and where supervisors can still improve.
While discussing the ECB approach to supervising bank governance, she outlined the tools being used by ECB. The tools included the fit and proper assessments; Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process or SREP, including risk appetite frameworks; the "deep-dive" tool; on-site inspections; and benchmarking banks from across the euro area. "All the tools I just mentioned have proven to be quite useful and we can already see that banks have significantly improved their governance and risk management," said Ms. Nouy. Banks have started to follow the recommendations on fit and proper assessments and self-assessment has become a common practice for bank boards. Banks are striving to enhance the structure and organization of their boards in line with the highest international standards. Some banks have split risk and audit committees while others have set up clear reporting lines to the risk and audit committees for certain functions. Additionally, banks have made progress in designing their risk appetite frameworks (RAFs). They have clarified the roles of the different stakeholders and internal audit functions have become increasingly involved in the independent review of their RAFs.
Next, she discussed the ways in which banks can implement further improvements in the area of governance. The size of banks’ boards should not impede their decision-making, especially in crisis situations that require quick decisions. The collective knowledge of boards can still be improved. Banks also need to maintain an adequate level of control. Under no circumstances should banks cut costs at the expense of risk management and of the quality of risk data aggregation and reporting. It is also important that banks’ budgetary processes are aligned with their risk appetite frameworks. RAFs should be further enhanced, particularly for non-financial risks such as compliance, reputational, IT, legal, and conduct risks. Moreover, banks should work toward a balance between risk and reward and remuneration schemes should be better aligned with RAFs. Finally, data quality should be improved, especially for data underlying the risk reports presented to banks’ boards or data used in designing the IT architecture. IT and management information systems are crucial for the ability of banks’ boards to easily obtain key information on the bank’s risk capacity, risk appetite, risk limits and risk profile across business lines and subsidiaries.
Ms. Nouy highlighted that supervisors and regulators can further improve their toolkit. "Fit and proper rules are a case in point. They are an “old” part of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV, drafted under “minimal harmonization principles” and would benefit significantly from further harmonization." Policymakers should address three main issues to achieve this goal. First, all fit and proper assessments should be carried out before the candidate is appointed and takes up the new function. Second, a single methodology is needed to determine whether members of the management body are truly independent and have no conflicts of interest. At present, national law and supervisory practices on independence differ across the euro area, resulting in an uneven playing field for banks. Third, there needs to be full clarity on the definition of “key function holders.” Overall, she highlighted the importance of governance and emphasized that good governance is "a timeless asset for every bank."
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Supervision, Governance, CRD IV, Risk Appetite, ECB
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.
FINMA published guidance (06/2020) on extending or discontinuing various exemptions that were granted due to the COVID-19 crisis.
SRB launched a consultation on the minimum data needed for valuation of a bank in resolution.
EIOPA announced a change in the frequency of current extraordinary processes for risk-free interest rate term structures (RFR) and symmetric adjustment to equity risk (EDA) from a weekly basis to every two weeks.