ECB published the revised assessment methodology for payment systems. The revised methodology covers the requirements introduced by the revised systemically important payment systems (SIPS) Regulation, which entered into force in December 2017 and additionally references the Eurosystem’s Cyber Resilience Oversight Expectations (CROE), which are based on the CPMI-IOSCO guidance on cyber resilience for financial market infrastructures (June 2016). The CROE contain expectations for SIPS and non-SIPS that have differing maturity levels applicable to different types of systems.
The first part of the document contains questions for the assessment of payment systems (all categories) and the second part contains questions for the assessment of links between retail payment systems (RPSs). Overseers will use the questions in the left-hand column (which reflect the text and the requirements of the SIPS Regulation) if the payment system being assessed is classified as a SIPS and the relevant questions (based on CPMI-IOSCO methodology) from the right-hand column when assessing a payment system that is not a SIPS. The sequence of the assessment questions in the document follows the order of the articles of the SIPS Regulation. Competent authorities, which are the Eurosystem central banks with primary oversight responsibilities for one or more payment systems, are expected to regularly assess compliance of these systems with the requirements of the SIPS Regulation and/or the Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMIs), whichever is applicable.
The assessment methodology of Eurosystem for payment systems serves to promote full observance of the requirements laid down in the SIPS Regulation or PFMIs by helping assessors to identify non-compliance and/or issues of concern that should be addressed. The answers to the questions will serve as the key input for actual oversight assessment; the assessment should always use the requirements, either in the SIPS Regulation or the PFMIs, as a reference. The Eurosystem assessment methodology takes the CPMI-IOSCO assessment methodology as a basis and complements it with questions from the previously used “Terms of Reference for the oversight assessment of euro systemically and prominently important payment systems against the Core Principles,” thereby establishing one single framework for SIPS and non-SIPS. The methodology also covers the “Oversight expectations for links between retail payment systems” (November 2012).
Related Link: Revised Methodology (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, PMI, PFMI, SIPS Regulation, Assessment Methodology, Payment Systems, Fintech, CPMI-IOSCO, ECB
Previous ArticleIMF Paper on Tool for Measuring Systemic Risk and Interconnectedness
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.