Featured Product

    FSB Initiates Peer Review, Seeks Feedback on Corporate Debt Workouts

    June 28, 2021

    FSB is seeking feedback from stakeholders as part of the thematic peer review on corporate debt workouts. The peer review will take stock of existing and planned out of court debt workout frameworks in FSB jurisdictions. It will examine the experience of mechanisms that have been or are being used to address corporate stress, including the role of financial sector authorities. The review will also seek to identify good practices and examples of how well out of court debt workout frameworks have worked in terms of preserving value for viable companies and how useful their debt restructurings are for resolving non-performing loans and for dealing with a large number of distressed corporates. FSB has circulated a questionnaire to its member jurisdictions to collect information in this area, with the feedback period ending on August 09, 2021. The peer review report will be published in early 2022.

    The objective of the review is to support the COVID-19 response efforts by examining FSB member jurisdictions’ practices, experiences, and lessons from out of court debt workouts and the associated implications for financial stability. The review will explore how losses to the financial system and economy could be mitigated by efficient procedures for the restructuring of financial debt of corporates, in particular in an economic environment that may entail restructuring needs for a large number of companies. To this end, the review will focus on the legal and regulatory conditions (or enabling framework) that facilitate out of court debt workouts as well as elements of the legal and regulatory regime that interact with the financial system. This includes regulatory factors that affect incentives for restructuring (for example, prudential treatment of a restructured loan, rights of existing shareholders), in particular with regard to restructuring mechanisms to efficiently work out a high number of failing loans. The experience of asset management companies will be also considered in this context, but the focus will be on how they have helped to facilitate out of court debt workouts rather than on their role in addressing problem banks.

    Furthermore, the review will explore the role of financial sector authorities in facilitating enabling processes and structures (for example, codes of conduct for debt workouts) for dealing with cases of corporate financial difficulty in which financial institutions have a significant exposure, especially in markets where the need for corporate restructuring has reached systemic levels. The review will cover non-financial corporates of all sizes to get a wider perspective of frameworks in place. The review will focus on out of court debt workouts for businesses organized as corporations. It will include financial institutions only insofar as they are creditors to corporates in financial distress and will not cover legal frameworks on the insolvency or resolution of financial institutions. Given the concerns about small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) stemming from cost, effectiveness, and administrative burden considerations, a particular focus will be on specific rules and practices for debt workouts for SMEs.

    Deteriorating credit quality of non-financial borrowers poses risks to the financial system; indeed, growing vulnerabilities in the non-financial corporate sector may increasingly affect banks and other financial institutions. It is therefore important to have in place efficient procedures for the restructuring or liquidation of corporates in distress. Thus, FSB is inviting feedback from financial institutions, corporates, insolvency practitioners, and other stakeholders on out of court corporate debt workouts. This could include comments on:

    • Types of out of court debt workout frameworks (for example, informal workouts, enhanced workouts, and hybrid workouts) most often used in a jurisdiction and the rationale for their use
    • Features of out of court debt workout frameworks that may be particularly helpful to minimize the economic and financial system damage caused by corporate defaults due to COVID-19
    • The appropriate role of financial sector authorities in facilitating debt restructuring, including to incentivize the participation of various stakeholders in an out of court debt workout
    • Experiences and challenges in the use of out of court debt workouts, including to manage the volume of non-performing loans in the financial system


    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Credit Risk, COVID-19, NPLs, Out of Court Debt Workout, Debt Restructuring, Corporate Debt Workout, FSB

    Related Articles

    EBA Proposes Standards for IRRBB Reporting Under Basel Framework

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed implementing technical standards on the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) reporting requirements, with the comment period ending on May 02, 2023.

    January 31, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    FED Issues Further Details on Pilot Climate Scenario Analysis Exercise

    The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FED) set out details of the pilot climate scenario analysis exercise to be conducted among the six largest U.S. bank holding companies.

    January 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    US Agencies Issue Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates

    The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.

    January 04, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    ECB Issues Multiple Reports and Regulatory Updates for Banks

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.

    January 01, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    HKMA Keeps List of D-SIBs Unchanged, Makes Other Announcements

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.

    December 30, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EU Issues FAQs on Taxonomy Regulation, Rules Under CRD, FICOD and SFDR

    The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.

    December 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    CBIRC Revises Measures on Corporate Governance Supervision

    The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.

    December 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    HKMA Publications Address Sustainability Issues in Financial Sector

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.

    December 23, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Updates Address Basel and NPL Requirements for Banks

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.

    December 22, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    ESMA Publishes 2022 ESEF XBRL Taxonomy and Conformance Suite

    The General Board of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), at its December meeting, issued an updated risk assessment via the quarterly risk dashboard and held discussions on key policy priorities to address the systemic risks in the European Union.

    December 22, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8699