Featured Product

    APRA FAQ for Standard on Margins for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives

    June 01, 2020

    APRA published a frequently asked question (FAQ) providing guidance to all APRA-regulated entities in determining their requirements under the prudential standard CPS 226 on margins and risk mitigation for non-centrally cleared derivatives. The FAQ addresses the treatment of the Minimum Transfer Amount limit where the base currency is foreign-denominated. CPS 226 requires an APRA covered entity to have appropriate margining practices in relation to non-centrally cleared derivatives. An APRA covered entity must exchange variation margin and post and collect initial margin with a covered counterparty, subject to certain criteria.

    The guidance states that, for both new and existing Credit Support Annexes (CSAs) where the collateral agreement base currency is not in AUD, APRA expects entities to incorporate a prudent buffer for foreign-exchange volatility movements when negotiating the CSA with a given counterparty. However, it may be the case that due to foreign exchange movements, the combined variation margin and initial margin minimum transfer amount exceeds the AUD 750,000 MTA limit despite being below this limit at inception of the CSA agreement. APRA is aware of the operational difficulties to frequently monitor balances as well as the time required to renegotiate CSAs. Notwithstanding this, the expectation is that APRA-covered entities have a regular review process to ensure that, in the situation described above where the AUD-equivalent MTA amount exceeds the prudential limit, amendments are made to the CSA to return under the AUD 750,000 MTA limit with priority to be given to those whose combined variation and initial margin minimum transfer amount are notably greater than the AUD 750,000 limit and have remained so for some time. During the review process, consideration should be given to the following:

    • Expected volatility and direction of foreign-exchange rates;
    • Difference between the MTA and the AUD 750,000 MTA limit and the duration of the excess
    • Nature and level of trading activity undertaken with the counterparty

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Securities, CPS 226, Initial Margin, Derivatives, FAQ, Minimum Transfer Amount, APRA

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Reviews Repayment Deferral Plans, Identifies Best Practices

    APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.

    September 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Assess Risks to Financial Sector After COVID-19 Outbreak

    ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    September 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Confirms Withdrawal of COVID Corporate Financing Facility

    BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.

    September 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Allows Temporary Relief in Leverage Ratio Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

    ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Launch Survey on Templates for Product Disclosures Under SFDR

    ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Proposes Integrated Reporting Framework to Reduce Burden for Banks

    ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Deems UK Framework for CCPs Temporarily Equivalent to EMIR Rules

    EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA to Phase Out Guidelines on Loan Repayment Moratoria

    EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Provides Opinion on Definition of Credit Institution in CRR

    EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).

    September 18, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Finalizes Methodology to Assess CCR and A-CVA Risk of Banks

    ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.

    September 18, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5820