APRA issued a letter setting out its expectations on the regulatory treatment of AASB 9 expected credit loss (ECL) provisions and possible transition arrangements. All authorized deposit-taking institutions are required to apply AASB 9 Financial Instruments (AASB 9) for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 01, 2018.
BCBS had recently finalized an interim provisioning approach that retains the current regulatory treatment of accounting for ECL provisions. BCBS recommended that regulatory authorities should provide guidance, as appropriate, on how they intend to categorize ECL provisions as General Provisions or Specific Provisions in their jurisdiction. When applying the Prudential Standard APS 220 Credit Quality (APS 220) requirements (paragraphs 39, 42, 43, 46–49), APRA expects authorized deposit-taking institutions to adopt the following approach to the three AASB 9 provisioning stages:
Stage 1 (representing 12-month ECL provisions on performing loans)—Allocate to General Reserve for Credit Losses (GRCL), if held against future, presently unidentified losses and, therefore, freely available to meet losses that subsequently materialize.
Stage 2 (representing lifetime ECL provisions on underperforming loans)—Consider as Specific Provision for regulatory purposes. However, any portion that represents an amount for future, presently unidentified losses, would qualify as GRCL.
Stage 3 (representing lifetime ECL provisions on nonperforming loans)—Consider as Specific Provision for regulatory purposes.
The GRCL amount that may be included in tier 2 Capital, gross of tax effects, under the Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital (APS 111) (paragraph 32) remains unchanged. APRA already has adopted a GRCL concept in APS 220 that reflects a lifetime ECL concept within its prudential framework. APRA’s informal consultation has indicated that regulated entities will not need transitional arrangements. However, if entities believe that their capital position will be significantly affected, they should approach APRA for discussion on possible transition arrangements. APRA intends to update APS 220 in due course to reflect the appropriate treatment of provisions under AASB 9.
Related Link: Letter on AASB 9 (PDF)
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, APRA, AASB 9, IFRS 9, ECL, APS 220
Previous ArticleCBRC Consults on Measures for Managing Large Exposures of Banks
MAS and Temasek jointly released a report to mark the successful conclusion of the fifth and final phase of Project Ubin, which focused on building a blockchain-based multi-currency payments network prototype.
PRA published a public working draft, or PWD, of version 1.2.0 of the BoE Insurance XBRL taxonomy, along with the related technical artefacts.
CPMI published a report that sets out nineteen building blocks for a global roadmap to improve cross-border payments.
EBA published phase 2 of the technical package on the reporting framework 2.10, providing the technical tools and specifications for implementation of EBA reporting requirements.
APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
PRA updated the statement that provides guidance to regulated firms on implementation of the EBA guidelines on reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures applied in response to the COVID-19 crisis.
EBA updated the 2019 list of closely correlated currencies that was originally published in December 2013.
ESMA published the final report on the guidelines on securitization repository data completeness and consistency thresholds.
FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant insurance companies, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, an additional year to implement the Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 on targeted improvements to accounting for long-duration insurance contracts, or LDTI (Topic 944).
APRA updated the regulatory approach for loans subject to repayment deferrals amid the COVID-19 crisis.