Featured Product

    CBIRC Publishes Rules for MSEs and Financial Leasing Companies

    July 03, 2020

    CBIRC published provisional rules on supervisory assessment of commercial banks’ financial services for micro and small enterprises (MSEs). CBIRC issued these rules to effectively use supervisory tools to guide commercial banks to comprehensively improve financial services for MSEs to alleviate their financing difficulties and lower the financing cost. CBIRC also issued provisional rules on supervisory rating of financial leasing companies. The rules consist of general provisions, rating factors and methods, operational procedures of rating, classified supervision, and supplementary provisions. The rules for MSEs and financial leasing companies shall come into force from the date of issuance. In addition, CBIRC, Ministry of Finance, and PBC jointly issued the notice on further improving the microfinance policies for poverty alleviation. The notice outlines six measures including a measure to further extend the repayment period of micro-credit loans, to the end of March 2021, for households affected by COVID-19 pandemic.

    Provisional Rules on Supervisory Assessment of Commercial Banks’ Financial Services for MSEs

    Regulatory authorities at all levels will guide commercial banks to take the initiative to use the requirements of the rules as benchmarks and conduct annual "in-depth check-up" on financial services for MSEs. The key points covered in the rules include the following:

    • Clarifying assessment content and setting standardized indicators. The rules put forward assessment indicators that focus on credit services, cover the whole process of financial services for MSEs, and comprehensively assess the five aspects of the commercial banks' financial services for MSEs. These include MSE credit supply, institutional arrangements, implementation of key supervisory policies, innovation of products and services, and oversight and inspection.
    • Determining the assessment mechanism and standardizing the assessment arrangements and process. The assessment will be conducted annually and is divided into self-assessment by banks, collection of information on supervision, preliminary supervisory assessment, supervisory review, notification of assessment results, and filing and other related work.
    • Strengthening the application of assessment results and the role of supervisory assessment to provide incentives and guidance. The rules clarify the application of assessment results and emphasize coordination with relevant policy measures, to provide guidance for commercial banks to better serve MSEs.

    Provisional Rules on Supervisory Rating of Financial Leasing Companies

    The key highlights of the rules include the following:

    • The rules set forth supervisory rating factors and methods. The supervisory rating factors of financial leasing companies mainly include capital management, management quality, risk management, and strategic management and professional capability, with respective weights of 15%, 25%, 35%, and 25%. The rules also put forward the corresponding downgrading clauses for special circumstances such as major criminal cases of financial leasing companies.
    • The rules clarify operational procedures for supervisory rating. The supervisory rating of financial leasing companies comprises the following procedures: initial assessment by CBIRC local offices, review by CBIRC headquarters, feedback of supervisory rating results, recording, and archiving. In principle, the annual rating work should be completed before the end of May each year.
    • The rules strengthen the application of supervisory rating results. The supervisory rating results of financial leasing companies are divided into five grades in seven levels: Grade 1, Grade 2 (A, B), Grade 3 (A, B), Grade 4, and Grade 5. Higher grades mean worse results, for which more supervisory attention is required. The supervisory rating results of financial leasing companies are an important basis for regulators to assess the company's operating conditions, risk status, and risk management capabilities as well as to formulate supervisory plans, allocate supervisory resources, and take supervisory measures and actions.


    Related Links (in Chinese and English)

    Effective Date: Issuance Date

    Keywords: Asia Pacific, China, Banking, COVID-19, SME, Governance, Financial Leasing, Supervisory Rating, Credit Risk, CBIRC, PBC

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles

    HKMA Finalizes Policy Modules on Group-Wide Approach and Remuneration

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.

    July 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Guide to Monitor Threshold for Intermediate Parent Undertakings

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).

    July 28, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    PRA Finalizes Approach to Supervision of International Banks

    In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    FCA Issues PS21/9 on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Proposes Regulatory Standards to Identify Shadow Banking Entities

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    IOSCO Proposes Recommendations on ESG Ratings and Data Providers

    The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    ESMA Group Issues Recommendations on RFR Switch in Interdealer Market

    The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    ECB Study Assesses Impact of Basel III Finalization Package

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    ISDA Finds FRTB Results in Higher Capital Charges for Carbon Trading

    The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News

    PRA Updates Remuneration Policy Statement Templates and Tables

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.

    July 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7311