MAS Revises Guidelines on Technology Risk Management
MAS revised the guidelines that address technology and cyber risks of financial institutions, in an environment of growing use of cloud technologies, application programming interfaces, and rapid software development. Post a consultation, the enhancements include new guidance on effective cyber surveillance, secure software development, adversarial attack simulation exercise, and management of cyber risks posed by the emerging technologies such as Internet of Things. MAS also published a response to the feedback received during the consultation process, in addition to a set of the frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the guidelines.
The guidelines on technology risk management set out the risk management principles and best practices to guide financial institutions, including banks, to establish sound and robust technology risk governance and oversight and to maintain cyber resilience. In particular, for financial institutions, the guidelines set out:
- Expectations to have in place effective technology risk management practices and controls to protect the information technology infrastructure: the institutions are required to test and validate the effectiveness of the recovery process once every 12 months.
- Enhanced risk mitigation strategies to establish a robust process for the timely analysis and sharing of cyber threat intelligence within the financial ecosystem and to conduct cyber exercises to allow institutions to stress test their cyber defenses by simulating the attack tactics, techniques, and procedures used by real-world attackers.
- Expectations to exercise strong oversight of arrangements with third-party service providers, to ensure system resilience as well as maintain data confidentiality and integrity.
- Additional guidance on the roles and responsibilities of the board of directors and senior management: the board and senior management should ensure that a Chief Information Officer and a Chief Information Security Officer, with the requisite experience and expertise, are appointed and accountable for managing technology and cyber risks and the board should include members with the relevant knowledge to provide effective oversight of technology and cyber risks.
- Expectations to establish and continuously improve IT processes and controls to preserve confidentiality, integrity and availability of data and information technology systems. Security measures should be implemented to prevent and detect the use of unauthorized internet services that allow users to communicate or store confidential data; examples of such services include social media, cloud storage, and file sharing, e-mails, and messaging applications.
MAS expects financial institutions to observe the guidelines on technology risk management as this will be considered in the risk assessment of MAS with respect to the financial institutions. The guidelines provide general guidance and are not intended to be comprehensive nor replace or override any legislative provisions. They should be read in conjunction with the provisions of the relevant legislation, the subsidiary legislation made under the relevant legislation, as well as written directions, notices, codes, and other guidelines that MAS may issue from time to time pursuant to the relevant legislation and subsidiary legislation. In particular, the guidelines should be read with the Notice on Technology Risk Management and Notice on Cyber Hygiene.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Technology Risk, Cyber Risk, FAQ, Internet of Things, Governance, Cyber Resilience, MAS
Previous Article
ESAs Publish Reporting Templates for Financial ConglomeratesRelated Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.