OSFI published guideline outlining the factors that it expects administrators of federally regulated private pension plans to consider when developing policies and procedures for the sound risk management of derivative activities. This guideline replaces the 1997 guideline on the best practices for derivative activities. The new guideline incorporates several revisions resulting from comments received during the public consultation process, which began in July 2017. OSFI also published a summary of the comments received from stakeholders and how they have been addressed.
The new guideline covers both exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. It builds on the 1997 version by reflecting current practices with respect to the risk management of derivatives activities. While derivatives can be effective tools for risk mitigation, the associated risks must be identified, measured, monitored, and controlled as part of the comprehensive risk management framework of a pension plan. The guideline also sets expectations for plan administrators that invest in derivatives indirectly through various types of funds, including pooled funds and hedge funds.
OSFI expects plan administrators to consider how this guideline applies to their pension plan, keeping in mind their investment objectives, risk tolerance, and other relevant factors. Prudence may require some plans to have more rigorous practices and procedures than others. Prudence may also lead an administrator to a determination that derivative transactions, or certain types of derivatives, are inappropriate for a particular pension plan. It is the responsibility of the plan administrator to make these determinations.
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Insurance, OTC Derivatives, Exchange Traded Derivatives, Guideline, Pension Plans, OSFI
Previous ArticleBank of Italy Begins Test Phase for AnaCredit Reporting
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the March 31, 2020 interim final rule that provides a five-year transition period for the impact of the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology on regulatory capital.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.
FINMA published guidance (06/2020) on extending or discontinuing various exemptions that were granted due to the COVID-19 crisis.
SRB launched a consultation on the minimum data needed for valuation of a bank in resolution.