EIOPA issued recommendations for the insurance sector in light of UK withdrawing from EU without a withdrawal agreement. The recommendations, which are addressed to national competent authorities, provide guidance on the treatment of UK insurance undertakings and distributors with regard to cross-border services in EU after the withdrawal of UK from EU without a withdrawal agreement. The recommendations will apply as of the date following that on which the EU acquis ceases to apply to, and in, UK.
The recommendations provide guidance on the supervisory treatment of residual insurance business, with the objective to minimize the detriment to policyholders with cross-border insurance contracts. National competent authorities should ensure an orderly run-off of the insurance business, including the appropriate supervision. UK insurance undertakings without authorization should not conclude new insurance contracts. Furthermore, the recommendations provide guidance on the application of relevant legal provisions with regard to the cross-border insurance of UK insurance undertakings. Certain recommendations are also related to the orderly run-off, authorization of third-country branches, lapse of authorization, portfolio transfer, change in the habitual residence or establishment of the policyholder, cooperation between the national competent authorities, communication to policyholders and beneficiaries, and distribution activities.
Enhanced cooperation between national competent authorities is necessary to address issues arising from the unauthorized cross-border insurance. EIOPA will facilitate the necessary cooperation through the establishment of cooperation platforms. UK insurance undertakings should disclose the consequences for their rights and obligations to the policyholders and beneficiaries of contracts affected by Brexit. Guidance on the application of the legal framework for insurance intermediation regarding UK distributors after Brexit is also part of the recommendations.
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Insurance, Brexit, Cross-Border Activities, Supervisory Convergence, EIOPA
Previous ArticleIASB Issues Work Plan and Meeting Updates for February 2019
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.