EU Reaches Political Agreement on Sustainable Investment Taxonomy
EU ambassadors endorsed a political agreement reached between Finland's presidency of the Council and the European Parliament on EU-wide classification system, or taxonomy, which will provide businesses and investors with a common language to identify what economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. At present, there is no common classification system at EU or global levels to define an environmentally sustainable economic activity. The proposed regulation is meant to reduce fragmentation resulting from market-based initiatives and national practices as well as reduce the practice of marketing financial products as green or sustainable, when they do not meet basic environmental standards.
The future framework on sustainability will be based on six EU environmental objectives. These are climate change mitigation,climate change adaptation, sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, transition to a circular economy, pollution prevention and control, and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. The taxonomy for climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation should be established by the end of 2020, to ensure its full application by end of 2021. For the four other objectives, the taxonomy should be established by the end of 2021, for an application by the end of 2022. The taxonomy will be instrumental for EU to become climate-neutral by 2050 and achieve the Paris agreement's 2030 targets.
To qualify as environmentally sustainable, economic activities will have to fulfill the following requirements:
- Contribute substantively to at least one of the six environmental objectives
- Not significantly harm any of the environmental objectives
- Be carried out in compliance with minimum social safeguards
- Comply with specific technical screening criteria
The taxonomy will include two sub-categories of "enabling" and "transitional" activities. There will be an obligation to disclose, for each financial product, the proportion invested in the enabling and transitional activities. On this basis, EC will be tasked to establish the actual classification by defining technical screening criteria, in the form of delegated acts, for each relevant environmental objective and sector, respectively. EC will be assisted by a technical expert group, the "platform on sustainable finance," which will be mandated to provide advice for developing and revising the technical screening criteria as well as reviewing their usability. In addition, EC will be advised by an expert group consisting of experts from member states on the appropriateness of the technical screening criteria and the approach EC to be taken regarding these criteria. The new rules will be formally adopted by the Council and the Parliament following legal and linguistic revision of the text, pursuant to the "early second reading agreement" procedure.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Taxonomy, ESG, Climate Change Risk, European Parliament, European Council
Previous Article
EIOPA Report Outlines Key Financial Stability Risks for InsurersRelated Articles
APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
