IAIS published its report on process for the 2018 global systemically important insurer (G-SII) identification. The IAIS analysis is focused on identifying G-SIIs—insurers whose distress or disorderly failure would potentially cause significant disruption to the global financial system and economic activity. In collaboration with IAIS, BIS conducts data collection exercises to enable IAIS to assess the potential systemic importance of insurers in a global context (the G-SII Project). IAIS also published the instructions that supplement the guidelines for G-SII data collection exercises by setting out the specificities of the 2018 G-SII data collection exercise conducted for the G-SII Project.
The guidelines provide a general overview of the data collection exercises conducted for the G-SII Project and how the requested data will be utilized, along with the applicable confidentiality protections. The IAIS G-SII Assessment Methodology describes the internal processes of IAIS for the analysis of the data collected, pursuant to the guidelines and the instructions. For a complete overview of data collection and processes in connection with the G-SII Project, the guidelines, the instructions, and the G-SII Assessment Methodology should be read together.
IAIS participates in a global initiative to identify global systemically important financial institutions. IAIS participates in this initiative, along with other standard setters, central banks, and financial sector supervisors, under the purview of FSB and G20. IAIS used the 2016 G-SII Assessment Methodology to complete the 2018 G-SII exercise. Since the data used in the analysis is reported on a voluntary, unaudited basis, it may not be standardized, given the heterogeneous nature of firms' businesses and reporting requirements. Therefore, the analysis of IAIS has been performed on a “best-effort” basis. Importantly, the 2016 G-SII Assessment Methodology adds an extra level of transparency to the annual G-SII identification process for both participating insurers and the public.
Keywords: International, Insurance, G-SII, Assessment Methodology, Identification Process, G-SII Project, IAIS
Previous ArticleAPRA Releases Paper to Assist Banks to Meet Obligations Under BEAR
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting