BaFin published a fact sheet that describes its administrative practices for the regulatory classification of corporate bonds as part of the interpretation of the Packaged Retail Investment and Insurance-Based Products (PRIIPs) regulation. The information in the fact sheet helps to determine whether or not a corporate bond qualifies as a Packaged Retail Investment Product by assessing certain features of corporate bonds. For instance, a corporate bond that has an indefinite term and a subordinate status will not be classified as a Packaged Retail Investment Product.
The fact sheet states that identification of the products that must comply with the provisions of the PRIIPs Regulation is incumbent first and foremost on the manufacturers of investment products for retail investors and insurance investment products as well as the persons who advise small investors on these products or sell these products to retail investors. This evaluation shall take into account the economic characteristics and terms and conditions of each product.
Related Links (in German)
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Insurance, Securities, Corporate Bonds, PRIIPs Regulation, PRIIPs, BaFin
Previous ArticleSBV Signs MoU for Financial Cooperation with Australia and ADB
Next ArticleBoM Revises Guideline on Credit Concentration Risk
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.