MAS issued the final guidelines on liquidity risk management practices for fund management companies, with respect to the management of collective investment schemes (CIS). These guidelines have been issued pursuant to section 321 of the Securities and Futures Act (SFA). Draft amendments to the Code on Collective Investment Schemes (CIS Code) have also been published, along with the MAS feedback to the responses received to the consultation on the guidelines and CIS code amendments. The effective date of the revised CIS Code is August 17, 2018, except for the revisions to paragraph 8.8 of Appendix 1 and paragraph 11.1(c)(v) of Appendix 6, which will take effect for the first annual report relating to their respective financial year ending on or after December 31,2018.
These guidelines should be read in conjunction with the provisions of the SFA, the SF(LCB)R, CIS Code, along with the other relevant legislation and other guidelines and frequently asked questions (FAQs) issued by MAS. The guidelines aim to promulgate sound liquidity risk management practices that fund management companies should adopt, where appropriate, to minimize the risk of investor detriment due to mismatches in the liquidity profile of the assets in the CIS and its redemption terms. Additionally, amendments to the CIS Code seek to enhance the resilience of money market funds to liquidity risks and strengthen their ability to meet redemption requests from investors, especially during stressed market situations. The consultation on these guidelines and the draft amendments to the CIS Code ran from October 26, 2017 to November 28, 2017. After considering the feedback received, MAS has made further revisions to the guidelines, where appropriate.
Effective Date: August 17, 2018 (CIS Code Amendments)
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Liquidity Risk, MMFs, CIS, Fund Management Companies, MAS
Previous ArticleESMA Publishes Data for Systematic Internalizer Calculations
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.