EC published a proposal for a regulation that amends the Benchmarks Regulation (2016/1011) regarding the exemption of certain third-country foreign-exchange benchmarks and the designation of replacement benchmarks for certain benchmarks in cessation. This proposal aims to equip competent authorities with supervisory powers to ensure the orderly cessation of a critical benchmark, including power to mandate the continued provision of a critical benchmark using a different methodology or the provision replacement rate. It also aims to ensure the continued availability, to EU users, of third-country benchmarks for which no suitable alternative exists in EU. The proposal is open for feedback until October 06, 2020. EC also published an impact assessment report on the proposal.
The proposed amendments related to orderly cessation of a financial benchmark are designed to reduce legal uncertainty and risks to financial stability. There are three main pillars to the proposed amendments of the Benchmarks Regulation provisions governing the winding down of a benchmark with systemic relevance in EU. First, the proposed Benchmarks Regulation amendments will introduce a statutory power, whereby EC designates a replacement rate if and when a benchmark whose cessation would result in significant disruption in the functioning of financial markets in the Union ceases to be published. The replacement of all references to the “benchmark in cessation” with a statutory replacement rate is designed to avoid, or at least minimize, costly litigation by providing legal certainty for all contracts involving an EU supervised entity. Second, the statutory replacement rate will, by operation of the law, replace all references to the “benchmark in cessation” in all contracts entered into by an EU supervised entity. Third, for contracts not involving an EU supervised entity, member state are encouraged to adopt national statutory replacement rates.
The proposed amendments related to specific foreign-exchange benchmarks aim to exempt specified third country spot foreign-exchange benchmarks from the scope of the Benchmarks Regulation where they fulfill certain criteria. The list of exemptions set out in Article 2 of the Benchmarks Regulation would be extended to include spot foreign-exchange benchmarks designated by EC. This would be accompanied by a provision specifying how EC may exercise its power and the criteria for exempting qualifying spot foreign exchange benchmarks from the scope of the Benchmarks Regulation. For the spot foreign-exchange benchmark to qualify for exemption, it has to measure the spot exchange rate of a third-country currency that is not freely convertible and it has to be used by EU supervised entities on a frequent, systematic, and regular basis as settlement rate to calculate the payout under a currency forward or swap contract. Furthermore, to enable EC to have all the necessary elements to designate exempted benchmarks, ESMA and ECB are required to provide it with relevant information and views on specific exemption criteria. Finally, to monitor appropriateness of the newly introduced exemption, competent authorities and supervised entities are required to periodically report to EC on the use of the exempted benchmarks by EU businesses and the changes of the balance sheets of supervised entities in terms of exposure to third country currency fluctuation.
EC proposes to establish a monitoring program to evaluate whether proposed amendments deliver the intended results. This legislative proposal requires competent authorities of supervised entities using the replaced benchmark to monitor whether the replacement has minimized contract frustration or any other detrimental effects on economic growth and investments in EU. They shall report this to EC and to ESMA annually. This legislative proposal requires competent authorities of supervised entities that use third-country foreign-exchange benchmarks that are designated by EC as excluded from the scope of the Benchmarks Regulation to report to EC and ESMA on the number of derivative contracts that use that foreign-exchange benchmark for hedging against third-country currency volatility at least every two years.
Related Link: Proposal and Related Documents
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Benchmark Regulation, Financial Benchmarks, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Foreign Exchange Benchmarks, IBOR, ESMA, EC
Previous ArticleECB Examines ICAAP Practices of Banks in EU
APRA announced that it is resuming consultation on the confidentiality of data submitted to APRA by the authorized deposit-taking institutions.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
ESMA announced that it will recognize three central counterparties (CCPs) established in the UK as third-country CCPs, from January 01, 2021.
PRA published Version 02.04 of the PRA110 liquidity metric monitoring tool (PRA110 LMM tool).
FSB confirmed the Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC) of the Global Legal Entity Identifier System (GLEIS) as the International Governance Body for the globally harmonized identifiers used to track over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions, with effect from October 01, 2020.
FCA is consulting on its approach to the authorization and supervision of international firms operating in UK.
EBA launched the seventh annual transparency exercise for banks in EU.
The EBA Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 32 questions.
MAS published amendments to the Notice 652 on net stable funding ratio (NSFR), along with the related reporting template.
EC published the action plan to enhance the Capital Markets Union in EU over the coming years.