CBIRC Consults on Measures for Classification of Asset Risks of Banks
CBIRC launched a consultation on the draft interim measures for the classification of financial asset risks of commercial banks in China. The comment period for this consultation ends on May 31, 2019. The Interim Measures extend the risk classification from loans to all financial assets that bear credit risk and propose non-credit assets with credit impairment as the core classification requirement, especially for the classification of asset management products.
Compared with the current "Guidelines" on asset risk classification, the "Interim Measures" expand the scope of asset risk classification, propose a new core definition of risk classification, emphasize the debtor-centered classification concept, clearly define the number of overdue days as an objective indicator of risk classification, and provide risk classification requirements for restructuring assets. Additionally, the "Interim Measures" put forward systematic requirements for commercial banks to strengthen risk classification management and clarify the relevant requirements for supervision and management.
As per the new measures, commercial banks are required to improve the risk classification governance structure, formulate risk classification management systems, clarify classification methods, processes and frequencies, develop and improve information systems, and strengthen monitoring and analysis, information disclosure, and document management. After the implementation of the Interim Measures, claims overdue for more than 90 days, even if the mortgage guarantee is sufficient, should be classified as bad. Considering the severity of the risks reflected by the non-retail debtor overdue for more than 90 days, the bank should categorize its debt as bad if the debtor’s debt overdue for more than 90 days in all banks’ debts has exceeded 5%. In addition, if loans are overdue for more than 270 days, they should be classified as at least suspicious. If overdue for more than 360 days, they should be classified as loss.
As per the CBIRC notification, credit risk is the most important risk faced by the banking industry in China and a sound risk classification system is the prerequisite for effective prevention and control of credit risk. These measures replace the existing guidelines on this topic while drawing on the latest international requirements and keeping in mind the domestic regulatory practices. These measures are also cognizant of the BCBS guidelines, from 2017, for careful handling of assets (Definitions of Adverse Exposure and Regulatory Tolerance); these BCBS guidelines clarified the criteria and classification requirements for non-performing assets and restructured assets to enhance the consistency of the global banking asset risk classification criteria.
Related Links (in Chinese)
Comment Due Date: May 31, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, China, Banking, Credit Risk, NPLs, Interim Measures, Classification of Impairments, 90 Days Overdue, Asset Risk Classification, CBIRC
Related Articles
APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
APRA Finalizes Guidance on Management of Climate Change Risks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
EBA Publishes Single Rulebook Q&A Updates in November 2021
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
EC Finalizes Rules on Internal Approaches Benchmarking Exercise
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
EC Proposes New Measures Under Capital Markets Union Package
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
European Council Adopts Position on Digital Finance Package Proposals
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
PRA Proposes Rulebook Changes; BoE Extends BEEDS Testing Window
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
